I had to trim my screenshots due to being a mod elsewhere, so I can see mod names. I think the screenshot of the interaction really sums this one up. I initially commented after a brief skim of the article, basically enough time to figure out that it wasn't spewing great replacement bullshit, and then gave a little reminder that ecofascism is real and uses language such as "humans are parasites".

OP responded with a suspicious comment, and another comment pointed out the author's true intent, so I went looking deeper. At the very last part of the article, like 3rd to last sentence in the last paragraph, the author calls for a "non-coerceive" means to kill 70% of the human race. I called it out, and was banned.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Well I can't grow computer chips or the complex machinery I love. I'd still have to trade for that, we'd still need some sort of industry for advanced applications. But yeah you couldn't get me to show up at a bullshit office job thats for sure. I'm sure others would tho.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    i tought of that aswell. There are already computers that run off of pressurized air. The one mentioned in the article was factory made but am sure we can figure something out. If that fails we could fall back to mechanical computing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (1 child)

    The only thing I'd argue to try to keep is medical equipment and modern medicine. Thats the Only thing that has me hesitate with den industrialization.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment