732
Narrows it down a bit, I guess 🤷🏻 (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 2 weeks ago by to c/curatedtumblr@sh.itjust.works
120 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
tilthat T1,1_ there is no physical description of Jesus in the Bible. volcel-official False Luke 2:52 He's larger than a baby amateuropinions By the description of him driving the moneylenders from the temple, we can also tell that he fit inside the temple, which gives us an upper bound as well as a lower bound on his size. F7:1 veraxplus Ysf. It's been said that Jesus Christ was larger than a baby but smaller than a temple
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 22 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

He fit on a cross. I assume those were fairly standard in size. The Roman’s seemed like real schticklers for detail and order. I can’t see them going to Barney’s Discount Cross Emporium to save a few drachma.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •