you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 13 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Are you saying adding 8ths, 16ths and 32nds is trivial and having 64th in my example made it unrealistic?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    I'm saying that if you knew what you were talking about you wouldn't be working in 64ths in the first place. You picked 64ths because "hurr sure Americans dumb" and you know it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    I picked 64 because I don't use imperial and I have no sense of scalw what makes sense as a fraction unit. A bit paranoid, aren't you?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    I picked 64 because I don't use imperial and I have no sense of scalw what makes sense as a fraction unit.

    Exactly

    A bit paranoid, aren't you?

    Nope, just sick of arrogant Europeans acting like they're experts on shit they don't have the first clue about.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 2 weeks ago

    You come to a thread where people throw light hearted banter about each others' measuring systems and you feel attacked by arrogant europeans. Sounds a lot like paranoia. Chill.

  • source
  • parent