@zerowan Yes, I use Claude Opus 5.5 via Claude Code to check the source code of the repositories and then write the documentation. But then I use GPT 6.1 Sol to review the text produced by Opus. This is great because you can never guess which model makes the best findings. In any case, lately Claude seems to accept the majority of the suggestions and recommendations provided by GPT. I don't even know how can someone say that the outcome of such an itirerative process is just slop. Yes, it takes a lot of time and persistence. Yet, for the great majority of scenarios, the quality of the final output is always better than it would be without using AI agents/LLMs. This will, of course, not work as expected if there's no human being in the loop to make use of his judgement and critical thinking skills when agents seem to lack the proper context.