▲ 358 ▼ Linus Torvalds let Claude Code fix the Linux page cache. Then reviewers found a race. (thenewstack.io) submitted 1 month ago by mannycalavera@feddit.uk to c/technology@lemmy.world 165 comments fedilink hide all child comments They got to him
[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 83 points 1 month ago (7 children) Right there in your link, it says she's AI: Amanda Caswell is an AI journalist /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] giiicmrp@sopuli.xyz 22 points 1 month ago (1 child) I believe it should be spelled "meat proxy" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) I just saw someone call it "cuck coding" (vs "vibe coding"), because you just sit there. This would make meat proxies Code Cucks instead. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago Goddammit you had me there until the /s. 🤣 permalink fedilink source parent [–] fonix232@fedia.io 14 points 1 month ago (3 children) "AI journalist" is just as confusing as "child killer" Is it an AI pretending to be a journo (is it a child who's a killer), or is it a journo writing about AI (is it a killer targeting children)? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] kunaltyagi@programming.dev 10 points 1 month ago (1 child) English would prefer killer child instead of child killer for the former because killer can behave as a qualifier. Similarly, AI can act as a qualifier and while sports journalist is valid, any journalist writing about AI code, AI agent, AI whatever must realize what AI journalist sounds like permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] honesthenery@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 month ago word play is fun permalink fedilink source parent [–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago Not really... “AI journalist” might refer to a plain old astroturfing spambot, or to one piloting a reverse centaur, but it's still the same old spambot when it comes to it, and it'll still be spewing the same worthless slop, so the distinction is mostly moot, merely making the latter option a bit more tragic. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] giiicmrp@sopuli.xyz 22 points 1 month ago (1 child) I believe it should be spelled "meat proxy" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) I just saw someone call it "cuck coding" (vs "vibe coding"), because you just sit there. This would make meat proxies Code Cucks instead. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) I just saw someone call it "cuck coding" (vs "vibe coding"), because you just sit there. This would make meat proxies Code Cucks instead. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago Goddammit you had me there until the /s. 🤣 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] fonix232@fedia.io 14 points 1 month ago (3 children) "AI journalist" is just as confusing as "child killer" Is it an AI pretending to be a journo (is it a child who's a killer), or is it a journo writing about AI (is it a killer targeting children)? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] kunaltyagi@programming.dev 10 points 1 month ago (1 child) English would prefer killer child instead of child killer for the former because killer can behave as a qualifier. Similarly, AI can act as a qualifier and while sports journalist is valid, any journalist writing about AI code, AI agent, AI whatever must realize what AI journalist sounds like permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] honesthenery@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 month ago word play is fun permalink fedilink source parent [–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago Not really... “AI journalist” might refer to a plain old astroturfing spambot, or to one piloting a reverse centaur, but it's still the same old spambot when it comes to it, and it'll still be spewing the same worthless slop, so the distinction is mostly moot, merely making the latter option a bit more tragic. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kunaltyagi@programming.dev 10 points 1 month ago (1 child) English would prefer killer child instead of child killer for the former because killer can behave as a qualifier. Similarly, AI can act as a qualifier and while sports journalist is valid, any journalist writing about AI code, AI agent, AI whatever must realize what AI journalist sounds like permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] honesthenery@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 month ago word play is fun permalink fedilink source parent
[–] honesthenery@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 month ago word play is fun permalink fedilink source parent
[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago Not really... “AI journalist” might refer to a plain old astroturfing spambot, or to one piloting a reverse centaur, but it's still the same old spambot when it comes to it, and it'll still be spewing the same worthless slop, so the distinction is mostly moot, merely making the latter option a bit more tragic. permalink fedilink source parent