this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2026

316 points (90.3% liked)

Climate

climate@slrpnk.net

9,076 readers

1,944 active

0 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 3 years ago

moderators

silence7@slrpnk.net

Liberals Can't Address the Climate Crisis Because It Means Confronting Capitalism (www.currentaffairs.org)

submitted 3 weeks ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/climate@slrpnk.net

locked 120 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Also corporate funding.

parent

hideshow 5 child comments

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Corporate funding of projects that change climates, to be be precise.

parent

hideshow 4 child comments

[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Corporate funding of political campaigns and lobbying for laws that benefit and shield them from consequences.

parent

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (2 children)

No, corporate funding of liberal politicians' reelection campaigns.

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

Corporate funding of projects that change climates, do not help reduce climate change bud.

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 point 3 weeks ago

It's true that corporate projects change the climate, but I'm pretty sure that isn't what @nosuchanon was talking about. The "funding" phrasing is the clue: when corporations harm the climate they're usually just doing it directly through their own actions, not "funding" some other entity. And also, "projects that change climates" aren't "the obstacle preventing liberals."

parent