Rights groups warn of Tehran regime’s increasing use of executions to suppress dissent, with at least 600 this year

Human rights groups have raised the alarm over the growing number of death sentences and executions in Iran, after reports that a 23-year-old woman, Najmeh Amini, has been sentenced to death for blasphemy over a social-media post.

Amini, an accounting student, is being held in Vakilabad prison in the north-east city of Mashhad. She has been sentenced to more than 12 years in prison and death in separate cases heard by a revolutionary and a criminal court.

A source close to Amini’s family told the US-based Human Rights Activists in Iran (HRAI) that Amini was sentenced to death on charges of “sab ol-nabi” (insulting the prophet). She was reportedly arrested following online monitoring by Iran’s Cyber Police (Fata). The exact content of her posts has not been publicly disclosed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 86 points 3 weeks ago (30 children)
  • [+] 53 points 3 weeks ago* (26 children)
  • [–] 43 points 3 weeks ago* (8 children)

    I'm not rooting for Iran, but after we murdered hundreds of school children on like day fucking 2, I have been rooting against the US.

    If there is a way we can lose without Iran winning, then that would be ideal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 3 weeks ago

    Exactly. Rooting for the people of Iran doesn't make one a tankie. Being against US military intervention should mean being against US military intervention. One can be "rooting" against the US and still be rooting for the freedom of Iranians. Most of this fundamentalism is historically rooted in US interventionism in the first place! Destabilizing the country yet again will not help the women of Iran.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago* (3 children)

    Only way is to vote Democrat.

    It should come as no surprise that Iran is actually strengthened by the actions of this administration in practically every way. And sure as fuck Harris wouldn't have started Epstein Fury but instead carried on the legacy of her predecessor's JCPOA.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Dronama bombed west Asia too, and he did impose sanctions on us.

    Fuck your Republicans and Democrats. Rather see both go to hell.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago* (1 child)

    lol Trump has more civilian casualties under his belt than Biden and Obama combined. Not counting the previous Republican Bush administration.

    Your false equivalence fallacy falls flat and any blood past that differential is on the hands of those who wrongly assert "Muh Both Sides!"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 3 weeks ago*

    Putting aside the tankies, I think a lot of people are just rooting for Iran because they want to see Trump's stupidity blow up in his face. It's not really about wanting Iran to win so much as it is about wanting the US to lose, because that kind of arrogance and belligerence deserves a downfall.

    And, of course, there are plenty of people who are rooting for Iran because the Iranian people are already struggling under an oppressive government and don't deserve to then get bombed into the stone age by an angry, insecure man who just wants to make his dick feel big. Rooting for Iran and rooting for the Iranian government are not actually the same thing after all.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 3 weeks ago*

    Is it okay to think the regime in Iran is bad, but still root for them in the war because they are the underdog, and were seemingly behaving under the Obama era agreement?

    And then be worried because now the Iranian regime will probably end up getting nukes, and that will mess with the power balance in the region/world.

    And think that it's not all bad that the world can end up being forced to ditch fossil fuel because of this war.

    And then think Iran are assholes for supplying drones and other stuff to Russia.

    It's complicated when so many things (mostly bad) are happening.

    Edit: I forgot to add the worry that this war can end up triggering WW3.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 3 weeks ago* (6 children)

    So you would rather Iran loses to the US and instead of being able to follow the path of self-determination, they become a brutal puppet of the US?

    Because that’s what supporting Iran means, it doesn’t mean you agree with their government. It means you want Iran to win it’s defense against America and for the people to rebuild their lives.

    Prior to the US’ unprovoked attack, Iran was in the midst of massive societal upheaval and liberalisation. That has now been sidelined for decades as military and theocratic hardliners have all the pretext to force their will onto the people in the name of national security.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago* (4 children)

    I thought quokk was an anarchist instance. Hmm.

    See, supporting Iran's right to self determination and wishing them the best in kicking the teeth out of the hegemon's mouth is only half the equation from the anarchist POV.

    Only tankies would leave it at that.

    Condemning stupid hierarchical bullshit masquerading as religious freedom such as this though, should be pretty easy.

    This situation is probably going to be the best and most poignant example today of why we proclaim "No Gods, no masters".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago

    Being an anarchist does not mean I don’t want a country to stop being attacked by another. It’s also why I want Ukraine to win against Russian imperialism.

    If people are not in a state of war started by another nation, they are more capable of focusing on internal change of which the Iranians were literally doing before the US stopped that.

  • source
  • parent
  • Anarchists are braindead liberals anyway. Scratch an anarchist and a screaming lib comes out.

    I'm Iranian and I don't care about your support, whether you support us or not we will prevail, the stain that you are two siding an imperialistic aggression will remain though.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    True.

    So anyways, are you going to tune in for the live execution we have coming up?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 3 weeks ago* (1 child)

    Even though Hegseth is a fucking moron, nobody's getting executed for saying that Hegseth is a fucking moron. They are executing murderers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago

    I agree. If the state says they are guilty, they most definitely are. We shouldn’t question the law. Just like in this case where it is obviously known by all that the guilty party is guilty. They will always only do this to those who deserve it.

    The government would never say, make up charges against a political enemy to start searching her home.

    God bless the freest country of all, America.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)