Tootsie Rolls came out in 1907, and are a very... polarizing... candy, with fans and others who find them loathsome. They sell about 65 million per year, though some of those may be Halloween treats which filter to the bottom of a kid's haul and go stale.

Since 1931, they also sold Tootsie Pops. A 1970+ ad campaign asked, "How many licks does it take to get to the tootsie roll center of a tootsie pop?" (youtube link). Wikipedia alleges this is the longest running ad in US TV history. The matter has also been studied at universities:

In 2014, the Tribology Laboratory at the University of Florida published a study examining the coupled effects of biology, corrosion, and mechanical agitation on the wear of Tootsie Roll Pops. ... The number of licks required to reach the center, based on equatorial cross-section data, was found to be nearly independent of the licking style with the one-sided approach requiring 195±18 licks and the full-surface approach requiring 184±33. Detailed examination of the lollipops indicates that the minimum candy shell thickness is rarely (if ever) located along the equator. Using the global minimum distance resulted in a calculated 130±29 licks to reach the center, independent of licking style.

Here is a 1918 ad from near the end of WW-I.

1918 Tootsie Roll

Unknown date ad, possibly 1950s.

Tootsie Rolls

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 5 points 1 month ago (1 child)

It's kind of hilarious that we're analyzing it like this, but I'm down to nerd out :)

I almost posted a rebuttal, but I'm coming 'round to your point of view. If the candies don't have active propulsion of their own (such as an initial rocket kick stage), they would leave the plane with the same horizontal velocity the plane has, but quickly lose that horizontal component due to air drag, while accelerating downward until they reach terminal velocity. So they shouldn't be in front of the path of the aircraft. So the illustration only works if they had initial active propulsion, but we see no sign of that, and it may not even have been a technology yet in the 19-teens.

OK, I'm thinking you're right.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment