I'm maybe the opposite, but it depends on the awards. I read a lot of SF/F, and the core of my reading list is made from the nominees and winners of the Nebula, Hugo, Locus, and Arthur C Clarke awards. I do scan the plot descriptions first because there are a number of subgenres that I don't care for (zombie, military SF, alternate histories, to name the main ones).
I post my mini reviews here (and used to post my annual lists on Reddit back in the day), and sometimes the discussions will get me adding a book to my list. And if I really like a book I'll usually read the sequel, even if it's not as well reviewed.
There are a few other sources I take from, but those are the main ones. I've been pretty happy with it; I rarely read anything that turns out to be terrible, though sometimes I don't care for highly acclaimed books (e.g., Three Body Problem left me cold, but most people seemed to love it).