you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

there is no natural zoonotic path to Wuhan

How do you get from "we don't think the disease naturally originated in Wuhan" to "China engineered a virus, released it in their own city, and then used that as a vector for malicious infection of the rest of the world"?

Half the US intelligence agencies support the lab origin theory.

They also insisted Iraq had nuclear weapons.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)

    How do you get from "we don't think the disease naturally originated in Wuhan" to "China engineered a virus, released it in their own city, and then used that as a vector for malicious infection of the rest of the world"?

    I didn't. You invented all of that.

    Accidents happen even in level 4 biolabs. The is no need for you to be sinophobic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    We know Covid originated in Wuhan.

    That's never been confirmed.

    Neither has the "no natural zoonotic path" bit, incidentally.

    Accidents happen even in level 4 biolabs.

    And we're back to Wuhan Lab Leak Theory.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • A natural zoonotic path does not (yet) exist. It is correct to say none has been found.

    the Huanan Market in Wuhan was the early and main epicentre of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection.

    There you are.

    there is no indication that the Wuhan Institute of Virology had studied viruses similar to SARS‐CoV‐2 or artificially modified coronaviruses before the COVID‐19 pandemic

    This part of the paper is out of date. We now know there was a subaward to the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, to understand how bat coronaviruses have the potential to become transmissible to the human population.

  • source
  • parent