126
Flathub Reverses AI-Generated App Ban, Now Requires Disclosure (linuxiac.com)
submitted 1 month ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
35 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Obviously I’m not talking about the metaphor.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    It applies to the root too. It's a good metaphor.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    It was a poor metaphor. You absolutely can ban AI software in software you control. If someone then managed to lie and sneak some in and gets found out, ban them and purge their contributions.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] -2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Ok. Then you have an extremely broken piece of software. Congrats. Destroying a community project for ideology seems counterproductive.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I guess every community project was extremely broken until now that slop can save us. What a ridiculous take.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    I am very anti slop. But ripping out code that was good enough to pass review and was merged is just dumb. Ripping all the code a contributor contributed just because they where caught using AI is a recipe for destroying a code base.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent