Secure messaging service Signal is still ready to shut down its Canadian operations if Bill C-22, known as the Lawful Access Act, becomes law and is enforced. >

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -35 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Ah and Signal's weaknesses rear their ugly heads again.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] -27 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    They're definitely lying. No way they have that budget and aren't complicit

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Can you explain what you mean? I read the entire article and I didn't see anything about budget or money. Are you referring to something that's not in this article specifically?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • There's a species of fediverse denizen that loves to shit on Signal, probably the most heavily-audited privacy software around, with spurious and vague accusations. It is usually followed up with a recommendation for something with no audit, structural vulnerabilities, terrible UI, and infrequent updates that is mostly used by neo nazis (see, for example, Session or SimpleX). Best to ignore them. Signal is a non-profit and largely insulated from concerns of enshittification. There's room for critique, of course, but the tinfoil conspiracies are kind of ridiculous.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments