▲ 105 ▼ Signal VP reminds lawmakers the secure messaging app won’t comply with Canada's Bill C-22 (betakit.com) submitted 1 month ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/privacy@lemmy.world 8 comments fedilink hide all child comments Secure messaging service Signal is still ready to shut down its Canadian operations if Bill C-22, known as the Lawful Access Act, becomes law and is enforced. >
[+] artyom@piefed.social -35 points 1 month ago (7 children) Ah and Signal's weaknesses rear their ugly heads again. permalink fedilink source hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 month ago (1 child) ...by not complying with a draconian surveillance bill? Signal isn't perfect but they are making the right call here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] artyom@piefed.social 0 points 1 month ago By having an entity in the first place to force to comply. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Maeve@kbin.earth -27 points 1 month ago (4 children) They're definitely lying. No way they have that budget and aren't complicit permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] phar@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago (3 children) Can you explain what you mean? I read the entire article and I didn't see anything about budget or money. Are you referring to something that's not in this article specifically? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] sulfidedisburseangledafternoontipper@piefed.blahaj.zone 39 points 1 month ago (2 children) There's a species of fediverse denizen that loves to shit on Signal, probably the most heavily-audited privacy software around, with spurious and vague accusations. It is usually followed up with a recommendation for something with no audit, structural vulnerabilities, terrible UI, and infrequent updates that is mostly used by neo nazis (see, for example, Session or SimpleX). Best to ignore them. Signal is a non-profit and largely insulated from concerns of enshittification. There's room for critique, of course, but the tinfoil conspiracies are kind of ridiculous. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] phar@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago Thank you for that response. I thought maybe they responded to the wrong article or something. permalink fedilink source parent [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago Signal is also used by Nazis. However that doesn't mean much as many other things are used by Nazis. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 month ago (1 child) ...by not complying with a draconian surveillance bill? Signal isn't perfect but they are making the right call here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] artyom@piefed.social 0 points 1 month ago By having an entity in the first place to force to comply. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] artyom@piefed.social 0 points 1 month ago By having an entity in the first place to force to comply. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Maeve@kbin.earth -27 points 1 month ago (4 children) They're definitely lying. No way they have that budget and aren't complicit permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] phar@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago (3 children) Can you explain what you mean? I read the entire article and I didn't see anything about budget or money. Are you referring to something that's not in this article specifically? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] sulfidedisburseangledafternoontipper@piefed.blahaj.zone 39 points 1 month ago (2 children) There's a species of fediverse denizen that loves to shit on Signal, probably the most heavily-audited privacy software around, with spurious and vague accusations. It is usually followed up with a recommendation for something with no audit, structural vulnerabilities, terrible UI, and infrequent updates that is mostly used by neo nazis (see, for example, Session or SimpleX). Best to ignore them. Signal is a non-profit and largely insulated from concerns of enshittification. There's room for critique, of course, but the tinfoil conspiracies are kind of ridiculous. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] phar@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago Thank you for that response. I thought maybe they responded to the wrong article or something. permalink fedilink source parent [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago Signal is also used by Nazis. However that doesn't mean much as many other things are used by Nazis. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] phar@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago (3 children) Can you explain what you mean? I read the entire article and I didn't see anything about budget or money. Are you referring to something that's not in this article specifically? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] sulfidedisburseangledafternoontipper@piefed.blahaj.zone 39 points 1 month ago (2 children) There's a species of fediverse denizen that loves to shit on Signal, probably the most heavily-audited privacy software around, with spurious and vague accusations. It is usually followed up with a recommendation for something with no audit, structural vulnerabilities, terrible UI, and infrequent updates that is mostly used by neo nazis (see, for example, Session or SimpleX). Best to ignore them. Signal is a non-profit and largely insulated from concerns of enshittification. There's room for critique, of course, but the tinfoil conspiracies are kind of ridiculous. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] phar@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago Thank you for that response. I thought maybe they responded to the wrong article or something. permalink fedilink source parent [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago Signal is also used by Nazis. However that doesn't mean much as many other things are used by Nazis. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sulfidedisburseangledafternoontipper@piefed.blahaj.zone 39 points 1 month ago (2 children) There's a species of fediverse denizen that loves to shit on Signal, probably the most heavily-audited privacy software around, with spurious and vague accusations. It is usually followed up with a recommendation for something with no audit, structural vulnerabilities, terrible UI, and infrequent updates that is mostly used by neo nazis (see, for example, Session or SimpleX). Best to ignore them. Signal is a non-profit and largely insulated from concerns of enshittification. There's room for critique, of course, but the tinfoil conspiracies are kind of ridiculous. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] phar@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago Thank you for that response. I thought maybe they responded to the wrong article or something. permalink fedilink source parent [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago Signal is also used by Nazis. However that doesn't mean much as many other things are used by Nazis. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] phar@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago Thank you for that response. I thought maybe they responded to the wrong article or something. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago Signal is also used by Nazis. However that doesn't mean much as many other things are used by Nazis. permalink fedilink source parent