you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -3 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Apparently reading comprehension is not a required skill to be a chikfila shill.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    It’s the writing that needs work. Your comments heavily suggest that you only have seen the food but never halve eaten it. Is that incorrect?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    At no point does it imply I've never eaten it. You've chosen to infer that because you think it's a gotcha ihat feeds your pointless compulsion to continue arguing in favor of shitty fried chicken.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    someone else brings some in. And, because I have eyes, I can see them falling apart before even being picked up. And I conclude that I'm still not missing out on anything.

    You’re maintaining that this sentence doesn’t carry the implication that you didn’t eat the food?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Does the implication I don't eat food at that time automatically mean I've never eaten the good? Fuck. Education has failed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (2 children)

    Why would you choose a time you did not eat the food as an example of why the food is not good?

    Choosing that story if it were your only time being in contact with that food would make a ton of sense.

    Also, there’s no need to be insulting. It serves no purpose.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments