▲ 115 ▼ Chick-fil-A takes a stand against fast-food drive-thru AI trend (www.fox5atlanta.com) submitted 1 month ago by Mustachius_Grumpius@thelemmy.club to c/technology@lemmy.world 99 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago (8 children) So you’ve never eaten it and are judging it as bad food? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip -3 points 1 month ago (7 children) Apparently reading comprehension is not a required skill to be a chikfila shill. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago (6 children) It’s the writing that needs work. Your comments heavily suggest that you only have seen the food but never halve eaten it. Is that incorrect? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip -1 points 1 month ago (5 children) At no point does it imply I've never eaten it. You've chosen to infer that because you think it's a gotcha ihat feeds your pointless compulsion to continue arguing in favor of shitty fried chicken. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago (4 children) someone else brings some in. And, because I have eyes, I can see them falling apart before even being picked up. And I conclude that I'm still not missing out on anything. You’re maintaining that this sentence doesn’t carry the implication that you didn’t eat the food? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 0 points 1 month ago (3 children) Does the implication I don't eat food at that time automatically mean I've never eaten the good? Fuck. Education has failed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 month ago* (2 children) Why would you choose a time you did not eat the food as an example of why the food is not good? Choosing that story if it were your only time being in contact with that food would make a ton of sense. Also, there’s no need to be insulting. It serves no purpose. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 0 points 1 month ago (1 child) You continuing this argument serves no purpose. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 month ago Yet here you are… permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip -3 points 1 month ago (7 children) Apparently reading comprehension is not a required skill to be a chikfila shill. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago (6 children) It’s the writing that needs work. Your comments heavily suggest that you only have seen the food but never halve eaten it. Is that incorrect? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip -1 points 1 month ago (5 children) At no point does it imply I've never eaten it. You've chosen to infer that because you think it's a gotcha ihat feeds your pointless compulsion to continue arguing in favor of shitty fried chicken. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago (4 children) someone else brings some in. And, because I have eyes, I can see them falling apart before even being picked up. And I conclude that I'm still not missing out on anything. You’re maintaining that this sentence doesn’t carry the implication that you didn’t eat the food? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 0 points 1 month ago (3 children) Does the implication I don't eat food at that time automatically mean I've never eaten the good? Fuck. Education has failed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 month ago* (2 children) Why would you choose a time you did not eat the food as an example of why the food is not good? Choosing that story if it were your only time being in contact with that food would make a ton of sense. Also, there’s no need to be insulting. It serves no purpose. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 0 points 1 month ago (1 child) You continuing this argument serves no purpose. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 month ago Yet here you are… permalink fedilink source parent
[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago (6 children) It’s the writing that needs work. Your comments heavily suggest that you only have seen the food but never halve eaten it. Is that incorrect? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip -1 points 1 month ago (5 children) At no point does it imply I've never eaten it. You've chosen to infer that because you think it's a gotcha ihat feeds your pointless compulsion to continue arguing in favor of shitty fried chicken. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago (4 children) someone else brings some in. And, because I have eyes, I can see them falling apart before even being picked up. And I conclude that I'm still not missing out on anything. You’re maintaining that this sentence doesn’t carry the implication that you didn’t eat the food? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 0 points 1 month ago (3 children) Does the implication I don't eat food at that time automatically mean I've never eaten the good? Fuck. Education has failed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 month ago* (2 children) Why would you choose a time you did not eat the food as an example of why the food is not good? Choosing that story if it were your only time being in contact with that food would make a ton of sense. Also, there’s no need to be insulting. It serves no purpose. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 0 points 1 month ago (1 child) You continuing this argument serves no purpose. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 month ago Yet here you are… permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip -1 points 1 month ago (5 children) At no point does it imply I've never eaten it. You've chosen to infer that because you think it's a gotcha ihat feeds your pointless compulsion to continue arguing in favor of shitty fried chicken. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago (4 children) someone else brings some in. And, because I have eyes, I can see them falling apart before even being picked up. And I conclude that I'm still not missing out on anything. You’re maintaining that this sentence doesn’t carry the implication that you didn’t eat the food? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 0 points 1 month ago (3 children) Does the implication I don't eat food at that time automatically mean I've never eaten the good? Fuck. Education has failed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 month ago* (2 children) Why would you choose a time you did not eat the food as an example of why the food is not good? Choosing that story if it were your only time being in contact with that food would make a ton of sense. Also, there’s no need to be insulting. It serves no purpose. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 0 points 1 month ago (1 child) You continuing this argument serves no purpose. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 month ago Yet here you are… permalink fedilink source parent
[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago (4 children) someone else brings some in. And, because I have eyes, I can see them falling apart before even being picked up. And I conclude that I'm still not missing out on anything. You’re maintaining that this sentence doesn’t carry the implication that you didn’t eat the food? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 0 points 1 month ago (3 children) Does the implication I don't eat food at that time automatically mean I've never eaten the good? Fuck. Education has failed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 month ago* (2 children) Why would you choose a time you did not eat the food as an example of why the food is not good? Choosing that story if it were your only time being in contact with that food would make a ton of sense. Also, there’s no need to be insulting. It serves no purpose. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 0 points 1 month ago (1 child) You continuing this argument serves no purpose. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 month ago Yet here you are… permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 0 points 1 month ago (3 children) Does the implication I don't eat food at that time automatically mean I've never eaten the good? Fuck. Education has failed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 month ago* (2 children) Why would you choose a time you did not eat the food as an example of why the food is not good? Choosing that story if it were your only time being in contact with that food would make a ton of sense. Also, there’s no need to be insulting. It serves no purpose. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 0 points 1 month ago (1 child) You continuing this argument serves no purpose. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 month ago Yet here you are… permalink fedilink source parent
[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 month ago* (2 children) Why would you choose a time you did not eat the food as an example of why the food is not good? Choosing that story if it were your only time being in contact with that food would make a ton of sense. Also, there’s no need to be insulting. It serves no purpose. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 0 points 1 month ago (1 child) You continuing this argument serves no purpose. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 month ago Yet here you are… permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 0 points 1 month ago (1 child) You continuing this argument serves no purpose. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 month ago Yet here you are… permalink fedilink source parent