▲ 267 ▼ Apple will update Macs to protect users from AI agents with full disk access (mashable.com) submitted 1 month ago by TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com to c/technology@lemmy.world 41 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Seimhe@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (2 children) The apps i use have to request disk access which i can approve or not. I always assumed that meant problems like this were not possible. I think many of us have been under a false impression because of this. I assumed the other apps were secured, which was foolish of me, I admit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Seimhe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago Thanks. That is a fair point and also quite kind so take the time to say. permalink fedilink source parent [–] sanzky@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago I think the issue is that it becomes an everything or nothing. some people want to give apps access to their own documents but don't realize their are also giving access to things like their chat messages, cookies, etc. If they aim to provide a more granular approach while still allowing full access to those that need it, Im ok with that permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] Seimhe@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (2 children) The apps i use have to request disk access which i can approve or not. I always assumed that meant problems like this were not possible. I think many of us have been under a false impression because of this. I assumed the other apps were secured, which was foolish of me, I admit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Seimhe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago Thanks. That is a fair point and also quite kind so take the time to say. permalink fedilink source parent [–] sanzky@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago I think the issue is that it becomes an everything or nothing. some people want to give apps access to their own documents but don't realize their are also giving access to things like their chat messages, cookies, etc. If they aim to provide a more granular approach while still allowing full access to those that need it, Im ok with that permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Seimhe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago Thanks. That is a fair point and also quite kind so take the time to say. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Seimhe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago Thanks. That is a fair point and also quite kind so take the time to say. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sanzky@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago I think the issue is that it becomes an everything or nothing. some people want to give apps access to their own documents but don't realize their are also giving access to things like their chat messages, cookies, etc. If they aim to provide a more granular approach while still allowing full access to those that need it, Im ok with that permalink fedilink source parent