All nations within the Anglosphere (US, UK, CA, AU & NZ) have JD imposed towards citizens. I know that the US & Canada both inherited that from Britain, which explains why they have it. However, should it be entirely only the judge making the conviction (some countries operate on a lay-judge system meaning juries aren't used, such as Finland or Japan for example) rather than leaving that decision up to jurors?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -2 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Would you rather have 12 people from the street judging what kind of medical treatment is best for you, or just a single medical specialist?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments