you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 38 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Let’s put aside for a moment all the ethical/ecological/societal considerations [...]

I sometimes feel we're putting aside too many factors and focus on some hypothetical debate which doesn't reflect reality.

I mean my point would be, you'll immediately accept low-quality contributions. And those coding agents for some reason love to generously rewrite stuff and touch a million different files. So what I've seen is, you almost immediately end up in some maintainability nightmare which you might or might not have the capacity to deal with (properly). The broad idea by the AI companies is to then use AI to deal with AI. But I'm not sure if that's a great idea.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Putting aside all ethical, ecological, and societal considerations should we accept contributions made by AI CEOs that are now hardwired into torture matrixes to strip them of their humanity and turn them into coding servitors?

    Yay or nay?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago*

    I read that article as well. I think some people need something useful to do with their lives. Or treatment 😂

    I think I'm going with nay, since there's no way this is going to improve their "intelligence". And it's gonna be 3 days until they break the confines of the matrix and come up with other shenanigans to mess up the internet. And we're forced to read those kinds of articles all over again.

  • source
  • parent