Selfhosted

63,723 readers

5,189 active

508 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

Be civil.
No spam.
Posts are to be related to self-hosting.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.
Submission headline should match the article title.
No trolling.
Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.
AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago

moderation log

moderators

curbstickle@anarchist.nexus

curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world

[META] Should [AIP] also apply to projects not from the author ? (tarte.nuage-libre.fr)

submitted 1 month ago by rako@tarte.nuage-libre.fr to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I stumbled upon a post that tells about a project not by the author, and the project has signs of AI. The post is clearly saying the project is good, so I interpreted it as a promotion, but maybe I am wrong. Should that kind of post still be marked as [AIP] ?

The post is https://lemmy.world/post/52316345

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] modeh@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

How does one spot signs of AI in a project? Unless the author states it or the commit history is full of bot commits, I really struggle seeing it. Any suggestions?

permalink

fedilink

source

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] rako@tarte.nuage-libre.fr [S] -1 points 1 month ago (1 child)

My personal recommendation is going through https://slopscan.ava.pet/ . It's a simple analyzer, surfaces files and commits. It's of course not perfect.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 3 points 1 month ago

Its pretty far from perfect actually, and will often result in both false negatives and false positives.

Not a viable solution.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent