you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 21 points 1 month ago (10 children)

Maybe this is a bad take from someone with no military knowledge, but I never understand how "we need bodies for the meat grinder" so let's do conscription is often only mandatory for men?

You're either going to shove a gun in their hand and point them in the direction to shoot, have them run some equipment/weapon, or have them in a support role. Both men and women can do those things equally well.

Any very generalized physical differences between men and women would have minimal difference in the ability to carry out their tasks.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    Procreation. Long term it's less worse if it's half the men that get shot

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    This assumes human women are some kind of breeding facility, which they Are not, few men won't impregnate many women if not for apocalyptic scenarios, there fore that argument doesn't work. A young mother needs a lot of support, a man that just gives his semen and disappears afterwards is not very helpful in that case. Children are a multiplayer experience for a long time, not just a moment

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    The german constitution's article 12a has a clause on drafting women for work in field hospitals, but also explicitly states they can't be forced into combat roles.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments