2
This never ending animosity is the sadest thing in my lifetime (lemmy.ca)
submitted 1 month ago by to c/usa@lemmy.ml
33 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I am soon 53, and this never ending hate between so many people over these last few years is the sadest thing to happen in my lifetime. While I have always thought that the EU should streamline more, and I also support talking about issues that need to be solved, what is happening now is something else. I support Trump when he says that Europe must take more care of its own defense, that is fair. What do not support is an environment in which there is so much animosity that one no longer can say anything, however moderate, out of fear of being mowed down in now man's land.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 month ago (6 children)

The Rafale and Eurofighter Typhoon, as well as Sweden's SAAB's jets, are all 4th generation jets. The F-35 is 5th. One project for a unified European sixth generation fighter jet was apparently cancelled in June of this year, as France and Germany couldn't agree on something or another. So the existing fighters will all turn obsolete soon, and the nations are incapable of agreeing what to do and will all have to work towards their own decisions for the future. Some turn to US's F-35 (or possibly the F-47 maybe in the future sometime, if the US can fix the 14 billion dollar hole in their MIC). Or maybe the Tempest, but that's not coming until 2035 apparently. The leaders here are expecting and preparing for a war with Russia by 2030 after all.

Despite the name, rare-earth minerals themselves aren't actually that rare. What's problematic is the lack of infrastructure around refinement of said materials into components that are actually usable in the defense industry. China controls most of the supply precisely due to their advanced refinement and manufacturing infrastructure, in addition to just mining. China currently controls approx. 90% of the entire supply of the rare-earths needed for military industry. Europe has no mines, and only two refineries, and apparently of those only one can process all 17 of rare-earths. 98% of the European need for these are imported from China. I have serious doubts as to the EU as it stands achieving any kind of independence from anyone.

Germany has been lauded as the workhorse of Europe for a while now, even though those in charge of the factories are currently shedding workers to save profits as capitalists tend to do. Volkswagen just announced its plans to shed 100k workers by 2030. These aren't the actions of healthy economies, or nations that are in any way ready for war. More like impotent threats from a bully who hasn't yet realized its larger friend's (US) legs are broken.

You didn't really answer any of my issues, just brought up more.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

    I am not sure I understood your question. You say we have no defense and therefore we should not pay for it? You say there are no rare earth mines, but there is rare earth both in Norway and on Greenland. Greenland has no infrastructure, and would be very expensive. But Alaska also has rare earth, and it i think has infrastructure and is much nearer silicon valley and china? Norway has huge amounts of rare earth? I am not talking about independence in the sense ties are severed, I am talking about having more than ONE BRAND OF CORNFLAKES. There are those who want to limit the number of cornflakes brands, and force us to eat state cornflakes. This is something we must not allow. It is about avoiding monopolies and potential extortion similar to the gas crisis. It is not about boycotting either the us or china.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (4 children)

    nah man, I can't really follow your train of thought on any issue. I'm saying Europe's defence is nonexistent by being tied to an insufficient industrial base in both EU and US by virtue of NATO. The rare-earth minerals exist in the ground in both areas evidently, but neither have the industrial capacity to acquire or refine them to supply their defence industries in any meaningful amount, as China controls most of the global supply of these. I'd support my country (after a communist revolution, of course) as it tried to distance itself from the US, NATO and EU, as these all serve only to make our lives worse; I'd also support it in an endeavour to close its ties to China, as having a functional military would be needed to defend itself from the genocidal empire that is the US/EU and NATO. As it stands, though, I am opposed to any and all increases in military spending, as it will only serve the ruling class to kill more innocents, and will eventually provide nothing of worth for me, nor will it increase the quality of life any outside the ruling class.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 month ago (3 children)

    Europe, for the most part does not agree with US wars, and this is one of the reasons why it should have a better defense. It is also fair that US tax dollars benefit US citizens, education and health? The Eu can create many things, but is dependent on them using what the y create. The way I see it there is no greater enemy of Eu tech and it business than the Eu itself. And I am not talking about boycotts or tariffs.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)

    The people here might have varying opinions on US forever wars, but the governments seem to be mostly aboard. US wouldn't use their dollars to benefit their people except the insignificant minority who own the means of production, and the same applies to its European vassals. We agree that EU is in itself what holds us all back, but I'd go as far as to argue also against the capitalist mode of production and neoliberal society which legitimizes and maintains it (base and superstructure). I don't think there is a hope of fixing issues in our productive forces without addressing the issues within that society, mainly the private ownership of the means of production and the exploitation of the worker.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 0 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    There is no alternative regarding "means of production", or any other utopian system so far that has actually worked. What the AI revolution will do remains to be seen. Normally what happens in all revolutions, including both the Russian and Chinese revolutions and the internet revolution, is an initial period of idealism. Then gradually you notice old power structures reasserting themselves, often under new names or terms. So the notion of freedom in the sense of a classless society has never existed, and will probably never exist. That does not mean that the world cannot become more fair. But mankind can never be forced to become something it is not. An ideology forced down the throat of all empirical evidence.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •