you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 23 points 1 month ago (24 children)
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago* (4 children)

    Hey, instead of arguing on Lemmy about who is being more useless, can we just try to stop the damn child killing machine together

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Before grabbing my rifle, I'd appreciate it if people would at least try voting first.

    Vote Democrat in the general election for harm reduction, and vote in the Democratic primaries to move the party left.

    Gas prices are at record highs. Whatever your thoughts are on cars or how gas may still be too cheap considering the damage it causes or whatever, the reality is that high gas prices have historically been really bad for incumbent parties in mid-terms. With that and the historic disapproval rating of Trump, there hasn't been an election more primed for a flip than this one in our lifetimes.

    It's why they're working so fucking hard to supress votes. They know they're in real trouble.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    I've been voting in every major election since 2016, and I don't regret doing it but I do feel myself becoming more and more disillusioned each time about whether the sort of democratic machinery we've built is even capable of producing the sort of radical change the American empire desperately needs. I really can't blame people who've concluded that voting isn't going to work.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    Before grabbing my rifle, I’d appreciate it if people would at least try voting first.

    It has been two hundred years of trying voting and we're now 1943 Germany.

    Simply be honest: there is nothing on Earth that would compel you to pick up your rifle just so long as it wasn't happening to you.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    People have tried voting for hundreds of years. Not once has the working class had power, beyond perhaps the brief period of reconstruction before the capitalists in the north worked with the capitalists in the south to put a stop to it. The idea that the DNC can be "pushed left" is based on a belief that the state exists outside of class society, rather than being built upon it. The capitalist state isn't a capitalist state because capitalists control it, but because it is shaped and reinforced by the capitalist system it rests on top of. You cannot change that by simply changing who runs it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 29 points 1 month ago (18 children)

    It can only be changed by liberals waking up

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 1 month ago (18 children)
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago (12 children)

    there's more than 2 parties you can vote for and the meme shows why the 2 dominant parties are no different where it matters.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [+] -11 points 1 month ago (12 children)
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    Which is still far more chance of changing things than you get by voting more power to the people actively opposed to changing anything that benefits their donors.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 1 month ago (7 children)
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago

    ceding your choice, you enable the worse outcome

    The worse outcome is either Wall St fellating warmonger winning . The worse outcome is ShitLibs like you getting their wish to return to the pre-Trump status quo.

    you're an accelerationist above all else.

    Thanks for making it so obvious this early on the convo that you don't know what the words you're using mean. It'll save a lot of confusion later

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    the assumption that you're ceding your choice or that your choice is going to make a difference is were reality gets disconnected.

    the fact of the matter is, we've been voting this way for most of a century now and it has already lead us to the same places that your understanding of accelerationism would lead us to anyways -- climate change that's guaranteed to fuck up human civilization; a panopticon powered by AI, financed by genociders, and will keep feeding off your body for the rest of your life like you're in the matrix; and a ruling epstein class that's so privileged it can literally publicly flaunt it's depraved desires to fuck/kill children with zero repercussions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 1 month ago (4 children)
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    the meme is pointing out the willful ignorance induced blindspot that liberal smugness makes impossible to address -- the same willful ignorance that makes this meme feel like it's doing nothing more chastising.

    and these conversations are necessary since history has already proven that we keep doing the same thing over and over again and we keep getting the same results -- yet americans chose to ignore history and have fooled themselves into believing that we can continue to keep doing the same thing anyways.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -5 points 1 month ago (3 children)
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    One of us is having a conversation about memes in the memes community.

    and it's not you because you're incapable of understanding the point of the meme annd the rest of us who do understand it are trying to explain to to the rest of you who don't understand it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -4 points 1 month ago (2 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    pointing out ignorance is not a personal attack and the meme broached the subject so it's fair game to talk about it -- the disconnect is that you're incapable of understanding it because you don't have the background understanding it requires.

    that doesn't mean you're stupid or dumb -- i used to be a liberal so i can understand that how i also wouldn't have been able to understand it if i hadn't put in the work at dispelling the indoctrination that all americans are born into.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Accelerationism isn't "make things bad by burning them down," it's accelerating the accumulation of capital and therefore the collapse of capitalism by supporting the most competent imperialists, which in this case would mean supporting the DNC. The communist take is to oppose both the DNC and GOP, the accelerationist take is to support the DNC.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (3 children)

    you should not expect anything to change by voting and history proves that substantial & enduring changes can only comes from us.

    still you should vote, even if it's for your dog, but there are better uses for it. the epstein class assumes that you will vote for one of their approved parties, so cooperating in this system the way they want you to only serves to help validate it at best.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 1 month ago (3 children)
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    voting on lemmy doesn't matter -- only the stomach you have for questioning your own indoctrination does.

    voting for your dog isn't realistic, but voting for psl or green or communist is realistic and many countries have been doing it for decades and things are much better for their people as result compared to americans.

    voting to change anything also isn't realistic, but mexico proved that it was still possible in 2017 and that's why they have president shienbaum while we're stuck with president trump.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    No, it just says you need to stay awake the other 729 days of the biannual cycle. You obviously don't want to do that, so you pretend it says something it doesn't.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -5 points 1 month ago (2 children)
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    That would be because you don't want to.

    You want to vote for "the good guys" and go back to brunch.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)