▲ 564 ▼ Pieces (img-9gag-fun.9cache.com) submitted 1 month ago by pelespirit@sh.itjust.works to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.ca 163 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (10 children) that's a straw man permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] adjectivenoun@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (9 children) Nah. You said voting doesn't work because I got the same outcome as everyone else. That's stupid. Voting works fine when enough people do it and do it intelligently. Americans simply didn't in 2024. "Eggs expensive! Let's try fascism!" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (7 children) You said voting doesn’t work because I got the same outcome as everyone else. that's not what I said permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] adjectivenoun@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (6 children) you got the same result as people who voted for Jill Stein and the people who voted for Trump. that’s not effective. Some memory you have. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (5 children) yeah. I remembered exactly what I said, and you couldn't even quote it one comment later. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] adjectivenoun@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (4 children) I suppose remembering what you said and knowing what words mean is different. Fascinating. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (3 children) rephrasing an argument to sound silly is the definition of a straw man. what I said is true. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] adjectivenoun@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (2 children) A strawman is where you invent a different argument, then defeat it. Rephrasing the exact argument you made in funnier language isn't a strawman. It's just what you said, but more plainly. "Voting doesn't work because I don't always get what I want." That's what you said in literal English. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) Rephrasing the exact argument you made in funnier language isn't a strawman. it is, and your quibbling belies bad faith permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] adjectivenoun@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago It's not. There's no bad faith. Your argument is simply humorously bad. Have a nice day. permalink fedilink source parent [–] dubs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 month ago It shouldn't be, but it's still amazing to me that Libs have to keep creating arguments out of thin air, and putting words into other people's mouths. Of course, if they could stick to the facts and the discussion at hand, they woulnd't be libs. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] adjectivenoun@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (9 children) Nah. You said voting doesn't work because I got the same outcome as everyone else. That's stupid. Voting works fine when enough people do it and do it intelligently. Americans simply didn't in 2024. "Eggs expensive! Let's try fascism!" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (7 children) You said voting doesn’t work because I got the same outcome as everyone else. that's not what I said permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] adjectivenoun@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (6 children) you got the same result as people who voted for Jill Stein and the people who voted for Trump. that’s not effective. Some memory you have. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (5 children) yeah. I remembered exactly what I said, and you couldn't even quote it one comment later. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] adjectivenoun@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (4 children) I suppose remembering what you said and knowing what words mean is different. Fascinating. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (3 children) rephrasing an argument to sound silly is the definition of a straw man. what I said is true. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] adjectivenoun@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (2 children) A strawman is where you invent a different argument, then defeat it. Rephrasing the exact argument you made in funnier language isn't a strawman. It's just what you said, but more plainly. "Voting doesn't work because I don't always get what I want." That's what you said in literal English. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) Rephrasing the exact argument you made in funnier language isn't a strawman. it is, and your quibbling belies bad faith permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] adjectivenoun@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago It's not. There's no bad faith. Your argument is simply humorously bad. Have a nice day. permalink fedilink source parent [–] dubs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 month ago It shouldn't be, but it's still amazing to me that Libs have to keep creating arguments out of thin air, and putting words into other people's mouths. Of course, if they could stick to the facts and the discussion at hand, they woulnd't be libs. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (7 children) You said voting doesn’t work because I got the same outcome as everyone else. that's not what I said permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] adjectivenoun@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (6 children) you got the same result as people who voted for Jill Stein and the people who voted for Trump. that’s not effective. Some memory you have. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (5 children) yeah. I remembered exactly what I said, and you couldn't even quote it one comment later. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] adjectivenoun@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (4 children) I suppose remembering what you said and knowing what words mean is different. Fascinating. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (3 children) rephrasing an argument to sound silly is the definition of a straw man. what I said is true. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] adjectivenoun@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (2 children) A strawman is where you invent a different argument, then defeat it. Rephrasing the exact argument you made in funnier language isn't a strawman. It's just what you said, but more plainly. "Voting doesn't work because I don't always get what I want." That's what you said in literal English. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) Rephrasing the exact argument you made in funnier language isn't a strawman. it is, and your quibbling belies bad faith permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] adjectivenoun@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago It's not. There's no bad faith. Your argument is simply humorously bad. Have a nice day. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] adjectivenoun@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (6 children) you got the same result as people who voted for Jill Stein and the people who voted for Trump. that’s not effective. Some memory you have. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (5 children) yeah. I remembered exactly what I said, and you couldn't even quote it one comment later. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] adjectivenoun@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (4 children) I suppose remembering what you said and knowing what words mean is different. Fascinating. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (3 children) rephrasing an argument to sound silly is the definition of a straw man. what I said is true. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] adjectivenoun@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (2 children) A strawman is where you invent a different argument, then defeat it. Rephrasing the exact argument you made in funnier language isn't a strawman. It's just what you said, but more plainly. "Voting doesn't work because I don't always get what I want." That's what you said in literal English. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) Rephrasing the exact argument you made in funnier language isn't a strawman. it is, and your quibbling belies bad faith permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] adjectivenoun@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago It's not. There's no bad faith. Your argument is simply humorously bad. Have a nice day. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (5 children) yeah. I remembered exactly what I said, and you couldn't even quote it one comment later. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] adjectivenoun@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (4 children) I suppose remembering what you said and knowing what words mean is different. Fascinating. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (3 children) rephrasing an argument to sound silly is the definition of a straw man. what I said is true. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] adjectivenoun@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (2 children) A strawman is where you invent a different argument, then defeat it. Rephrasing the exact argument you made in funnier language isn't a strawman. It's just what you said, but more plainly. "Voting doesn't work because I don't always get what I want." That's what you said in literal English. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) Rephrasing the exact argument you made in funnier language isn't a strawman. it is, and your quibbling belies bad faith permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] adjectivenoun@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago It's not. There's no bad faith. Your argument is simply humorously bad. Have a nice day. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] adjectivenoun@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (4 children) I suppose remembering what you said and knowing what words mean is different. Fascinating. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (3 children) rephrasing an argument to sound silly is the definition of a straw man. what I said is true. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] adjectivenoun@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (2 children) A strawman is where you invent a different argument, then defeat it. Rephrasing the exact argument you made in funnier language isn't a strawman. It's just what you said, but more plainly. "Voting doesn't work because I don't always get what I want." That's what you said in literal English. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) Rephrasing the exact argument you made in funnier language isn't a strawman. it is, and your quibbling belies bad faith permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] adjectivenoun@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago It's not. There's no bad faith. Your argument is simply humorously bad. Have a nice day. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (3 children) rephrasing an argument to sound silly is the definition of a straw man. what I said is true. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] adjectivenoun@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (2 children) A strawman is where you invent a different argument, then defeat it. Rephrasing the exact argument you made in funnier language isn't a strawman. It's just what you said, but more plainly. "Voting doesn't work because I don't always get what I want." That's what you said in literal English. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) Rephrasing the exact argument you made in funnier language isn't a strawman. it is, and your quibbling belies bad faith permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] adjectivenoun@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago It's not. There's no bad faith. Your argument is simply humorously bad. Have a nice day. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] adjectivenoun@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (2 children) A strawman is where you invent a different argument, then defeat it. Rephrasing the exact argument you made in funnier language isn't a strawman. It's just what you said, but more plainly. "Voting doesn't work because I don't always get what I want." That's what you said in literal English. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) Rephrasing the exact argument you made in funnier language isn't a strawman. it is, and your quibbling belies bad faith permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] adjectivenoun@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago It's not. There's no bad faith. Your argument is simply humorously bad. Have a nice day. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) Rephrasing the exact argument you made in funnier language isn't a strawman. it is, and your quibbling belies bad faith permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] adjectivenoun@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago It's not. There's no bad faith. Your argument is simply humorously bad. Have a nice day. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] adjectivenoun@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago It's not. There's no bad faith. Your argument is simply humorously bad. Have a nice day. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dubs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 month ago It shouldn't be, but it's still amazing to me that Libs have to keep creating arguments out of thin air, and putting words into other people's mouths. Of course, if they could stick to the facts and the discussion at hand, they woulnd't be libs. permalink fedilink source parent