I got the ad pictured in frame 2 today and it made me sad, so I made this meme. So many levels of sad:

  • Sponsored ad for a charity, plausible but seems fishy.
  • The needy children are positioned as "earning" the food and education they will get by your donation by writing back to you. Just way too overtly transactional.
  • The advertising tactic seems to prey on the lonely.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Assuming the charity is managing the money appropriately and donating it, is it insidious at all to use a stock photo?

Like it's insidious that we live in a world that to donate people feel like they need recognition from the hungry child. It's more insidious that there are hungry children at all of course

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments