4
Jensen Huang: “Now, if they say [that their models aren’t safe] … then I think the answer is that we have to shut the labs down (video.twimg.com)
submitted 1 month ago by to c/tech@piefed.world
2 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

lol it’s all corporate maneuvering to control the narrative rather than address the core issue that will be upon us in a few months. Most all business insurances in the US have sought and been granted exemptions for covering AI-caused risk/damage. It will be very enjoyable to see the first few companies learn this the hard way before major pullback occurs. https://www.csis.org/analysis/insurance-industrys-retreat-ai-threatens-slow-innovation-and-adoption

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    I was explaining similar to a pro AI colleague. We’ve already had a bank here fire a bunch of people to replace them with AI, only to have AI fuck up and cost them likely millions all said and done after they hired people back. The problem is you can’t hand wave liability (US is debatable though). You go to a client, manager, stakeholder or court and try to claim “it’s not my fault, AI fucked it up”, it just won’t hold up. If something was your responsibility/scope and you handed it over to AI, the LLM doesn’t just magically become responsible for the fallout. You made that call.

    Picturing insurance companies, the industry that walks away from customers who gave them money for decades to skirt paying for flood damages on home insurance; somehow being happy to pay for AI caused fuck ups. It just ain’t happening.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent