So...you agree that he wasn't involved in founding the company. He just likes to say he was, "on paper".
They aren't even "reinventing" what the term "founder" means...they're just calling him one, even though he didn't actually "found" the company.
This isn't hard to understand. These mental gymnastics you keep going through in order to avoid the truth, is really weird to watch. It's like out-of-control copium.