you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)

When talking specifically about safety plans and such, then negligence would be a thing to go after.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    I stand by what I said. The families deserve justice in whatever form that takes. There's already mandated safety plans that people are supposed to adopt, and the camp is fully shut down, so unless this is about justice for those families or improving the licensure process, it seems to just be the State trying to feed more people into its prison system.

    Harsh punishment or "making an example" has never been an effective deterrent to potential criminals.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago*

    I think you misunderstand me. This will fall under strict negligence. There will be a criminal trial and then, based on the evidence generated there, there will be a civil trial with the families suing, possibly together, where huge payouts will happen.

  • source
  • parent