...if it is a time-bound prohibition, maybe in the order of a few weeks, so society can rethink about their consumption habits.

Indefinite prohibition, of the kind that was amended in the US constitution, denies the human desire to consume alcohol and pretend it can be legislated away. A cursory reading of the Wikipedia article on the capital-P Prohibition showed lasting effects in alcohol consumption (I guess, good in the sense that there's changes in domestic abuse patterns, for example?) and organized crime (bad, with Al Capone and people like him)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 1 month ago (1 child)

Except smoking usage has increased in recent years.

Bans don't stop people.

Look at what happened during prohibition.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    Where are you getting that from? All the sources I'm seeing show dramatic long term decline, at least in the US, where the policies I'm talking about are in effect https://www.lung.org/research/trends-in-lung-disease/tobacco-trends-brief/overall-smoking-trends

    I agree that prohibition was a bad idea, and any measures that go far enough to create a black market for alcohol should be avoided, but there are other things that could be tried.

  • source
  • parent