The Copenhagen Interpretation of quantum mechanics says that you can have a particle spinning clockwise and counterclockwise at the same time – until you look at it, at which point it definitely becomes one or the other. The theory claims that observing reality fundamentally changes it.

The Copenhagen Interpretation of Ethics says that when you observe or interact with a problem in any way, you can be blamed for it. At the very least, you are to blame for not doing more. Even if you don’t make the problem worse, even if you make it slightly better, the ethical burden of the problem falls on you as soon as you observe it. In particular, if you interact with a problem and benefit from it, you are a complete monster. I don’t subscribe to this school of thought, but it seems pretty popular.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 1 month ago

benefiting from it is really seperate from trying to help and making it better but not solving it. also observing and interacting is really each seperate to. I mean we are all aware of many problems in the world that we can due fuck all about. really at that point its more about power and responsibility. the more capability you have to fix a problem or at least alleviate it that you are aware of the more responsibility you have to do so.

  • source