you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -34 points 1 month ago (18 children)

We would take Canada before we allowed it to annexed by the eu.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Good luck with that. We may lose in the end, but you'll pay for every meter... And we have a whole lot of those. If we fall, we're taking the US with us.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    Fuck using their version of ‘metre’. It’s a French word, not an English one.

    And yeah, it’d break them permanently. Canada will get plenty of vigilantes from other like minded nations as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago* (8 children)

    Go ahead and try. We burned your White House down once, we'll do it again. You learned nothing from Russia's invasion of Ukraine and it shows. We look like you. A lot of us sound like you. We can blend and infiltrate your shithole. Have fun dealing with guerrilla and asymmetric warfare, never knowing when that buzzing in the sky will be the last thing you hear as a drone blows your ass to kingdom come.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] -14 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    Sounds a lot like some terroristic threats bud.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    If your country invades mine, then such a thing does not matter. I and my fellow Canadians can and will defend ourselves and harm the enemy as we see fit, as any country being invaded would do. Russia considers Ukrainians terrorists for defending themselves and destroying their oil infrastructure too, but Ukraine is the one being invaded and has every right to cripple its enemy to reduce the amount of harm Russia can cause. America invading Canada would be no different. Stay on your side of the border, "bud".

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Yours was a direct military threat towards Canadians. Like the president you reflect and in typical US fashion.

    So that’s okay is it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (4 children)

    I said what would happen. And yes by definition discussion of military actions by a state is not terrorism. Terrorism is generally done by a non state actor. Like the whole definition.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (3 children)

    I said what would happen

    Yeah it’s a threat and taken as one. It won’t happen either successfully, they’ll gut you from the inside. With help from a lot of the rest of us as vigilantes.

    and yes by definition

    Who gives a fuck Seppo, we’re taking about the threat not the definition. Shove your definition up your arse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)

    Imagine sayin terror threats online against the USA. Not smart.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Annexed? You don't even know what that word means.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments