This is horrible. You could rightfully argue this does not properly count as court. Although this doesn't disprove any individual claim I made; the article mentions nothing about citizens being treated in this way, for example. Still wrong to do it of course.
This was a measure taken to increase oversight into database access, not reduce it. Agents have more access than they should, but this is a far cry from unsupervised write access to multiple agency's databases by people with no security clearance or oversight. If the point being made is about surveillance rather than unsupervised DB access: Yeah, I know the Biden admin did it too, that's why I didn't pretend it was something unique to the Trump admin.
Looks like regulations on federal land were proposed to increase, not be removed. Continuing to lease land could plausibly count as allowing nature to be destroyed though.
This was not Biden? It was a state level trial. But yes, keeping him in jail for that long is highly suspect, even if he did waive his right to a speedy trial.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/oct/01/steven-donziger-lawyer-sentenced-contempt-chevron
Not sure which point this is supposed to disprove.
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/05/20/biden-gaza-not-genocide-israel-00159020
Same with these three. I don't think I made any claims about Israel or Gaza at all? Correct me if I'm wrong, it's been several days.
Overall: You did provide several articles that, while not technically disproving any individual claim I made, make good points that the Biden admin is not entirely innocent on some of the topics related to the points I mentioned. Still, as I've probably said before, the difference in scale is important.