you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 114 points 1 month ago (29 children)

It gets better. Capitalism is designed to make sure you work for the rest of your life. Like a cow or sheep. While any rich person doesnt need to work or do shit. The aristocrats were all in on capitalism when it first gained traction. I wonder why?

  • source
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    The American dream narrative makes people falsely believe that they too can eventually become an aristocrat such that, against their own interests, they fail to stand in solidarity to hold them accountable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Step one, don't let people think. What are the chances of me becoming dont-need-to-work-a-day-more-in-my-entire-life rich, given zero relatives at that level of wealth and any country of residence? Practically zero, unless I am something exceptional

    I have no idea how it happens that so many fail to see even that

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 10 points 1 month ago (8 children)
  • [–] 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

    I think that's a pessimistic perspective. Especially when we have clear examples of what real material changes, even at the smallest levels of government, awaken people from that same pessimism.

    The idea that further suffering is a requirement for progress is exactly what capitalism is offering. That better things aren't possible.

    The conservatives will believe it when they are paying over $6 a gallon for gas. That the suffering is a requirement for progress.

    The left will believe it as a means of justifying inaction. That "the masses are just not there yet. They need to suffer more".

    The job of the left is to get the masses there. To show them what a functioning system actually looks like. That pot holes can be filled. That children can have daycare. That groceries can be affordable. That wars can end. That genocide is not a defensive measure.

    If there is no hope, the amount of suffering required to invoke change will never be directed into unified action. The frustration and suffering of the masses will continue to grasp to the scapegoats of the fascist. Because the fascist offer them a hope (falsely) for less suffering.

    You can't just wait until people are suffering to the point that they build the guillotines. People build the guillotines when they are suffering and have an organized direction and example of a means of reducing suffering.

    The levels of suffering are not the limitation right now. The amount of organization and unity within the left is what is limited. And that is changing quickly. We are building a movement to direct the anger of the masses towards the powers of capital that are causing it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -5 points 1 month ago (3 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    When I talked about the leftist using pessimism as a means to justify their own inaction; you didn't have to give me a textbook example of that. But, thanks I guess.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    The aristocrats were all in on capitalism when it first gained traction

    No they weren't. The aristocrats were upset that the bourgeoisie were getting uppity and taking their power. Read the communist manifesto, it was written back when capitalism was first overtaking feudalism. People were salty! The French had a revolution!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Yeah and guess who was funding both sides and the start of capitalism? Play both sides is the best strategy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    The same people weren't playing both sides. There were aristocrats who saw the writing on the wall and joined with the proletariat partially so they could keep their heads and partially because they figured they could come out as the new aristocracy if they played along. Plenty of aristocrats made the other choice and got beheaded.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -11 points 1 month ago (12 children)
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago

    55/60 for women/men but the pension wasn't exactly high. Life expectancy 65 for men, 74 for women. Population was still growing too. Retirement as a concept requires enough young people to serve the needs of the old.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    What is your goal with this question?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 1 month ago (3 children)
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago* (2 children)

    Oh, dearie me, a pure seeker of knowledge. Sorry, it's just that no one had mentioned the Soviet Union. And people usually bring up things that read like non-sequiturs when they want to establish a connection.

    And I didn't downvote. Yet. I usually wait to downvote until a commenter leaves little doubt that they're a dickhead.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 1 month ago (2 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Watch those downvote numbers. Because they're all about to increase by at least one now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Nah fuck that you prove to me humanity can do an economy properly than we have a conversation. At this point we will all die before we ever have a proper economy. The greed of the few out weigh the needs of the many.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    That's not proof an economy works. That's proof you can own a home.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    Holy shit you make a point and then lose reality. Why the fuck do you think those people were in poverty in the first place? You think what made them in poverty disappeared or was masked? There are still rich, poor and middle class. They have a broken economy because everyone has a broken economy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-2 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)