If you can't justify it, I'm obviously not going to change my mind. I've read many books and done my own thinking. I'm sure it's a huge surprise that someone could have thought about something and come to a different conclusion than you

Look mate. We clearly have differing opinions. Maybe you don't want to convince me of yours, which is fine, but if that's the case, there's not much point replying. If you do, linking me to other ways facts can be determined in legal contexts doesn't do anything to achieve that, does it? I do already know about judge-led trials, in case that wasn't obvious, and their existence doesn't support your opinion from what little of it you've shared.

I've had about five billion replies on this, mostly more one liners that show no thought. Try and do better.

The prosecution is airing its grievances, not the defence. And motivation matters in some circumstances but this this isn't one of them. Unless you want to implement a fair principle for everyone, which I think would do more harm than good.