▲ 104 ▼ Country Roads (quokk.au) submitted 1 month ago by CobraCommander [A] to c/mop 23 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago (14 children) Could we not have fascist originating memes here please? permalink fedilink source hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] Daxter101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 month ago (13 children) Fascist originating? Is it something about the lyrics? (I know nothing, asking for an explanation) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (12 children) The meme format/characters originate(s) from 4chan and therefore has deeply fascist roots. It's very self deprecating and plays into beauty standards because it implies only those commonly seen as 'ugly' by those standards are terrible and could never get partners. Whilst it also promotes those who are seen as conventionally attractive as 'good' and could therefore get partners. It is very much originating from incel culture for that reason too. The 'left' needs their own memes and to stop trying to 'clean' ones with harmful origins and meanings. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 4 points 1 month ago (8 children) The meme format/characters originate(s) from 4chan and therefore has deeply fascist roots. That's... that's a non-sequitur? Not that I care about what its roots are to be honest, but you're implicitly assuming 4chan is somehow inherently fascist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago (6 children) Image description: A scene from Mad Max: Fury Road where Max is driving in the car pointing up and at something and saying "That's bait." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 point 1 month ago (5 children) Uh... no need to describe the image twice? But also damn got me, my sinister plans have been foiled. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago (4 children) The double image description is for devices, frontends and apps that cannot see or access the first. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 1 month ago (3 children) Fair enough, but then why include the first? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Daxter101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) Assuming you're a person, the most descriptive/representative reason to add the description of an image, is as alt Text, for the visually impaired who use screen readers for example. Your claim that 4chan isn't necessarily fascistic is... Unfortunately ahistorical. 4chan has been so central to neonazi recruiting and propaganda, so many times, that it's not even funny anymore. Both the origin of the meme, and its real content, are pretty bad. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 point 1 month ago* for the visually impaired who use screen readers for example. I understand that, my question is why include it twice. Presumably screen readers will catch the second, so there's no reason to include the first. Your claim that 4chan isn't necessarily fascistic is... Unfortunately ahistorical. 4chan has been so central to neonazi recruiting and propaganda, so many times, that it's not even funny anymore. That's also a non-sequitur. 4chan being used for fascist purposes doesn't make anything that comes from 4chan fascist. The fact that 4chan is/has been used a lot by neonazis doesn't make 4chan inherently fascist, because only people can be fascist. 4chan has been used a lot for fascist propaganda, but so have radios. permalink fedilink source parent [–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 month ago That's a good question. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 1 month ago it has turned out that 4chan was quite literally made due to the involvement of Jefferey fucking Epstein permalink fedilink source parent [–] ddplf@szmer.info 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) The meme format/characters originate(s) from 4chan and therefore has deeply fascist roots. Yeah I'm not resigning from all the pepe and wojak originating memes, which is like 80% of the memes just because some random dude doesn''t like them. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Daxter101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) Ah yeah. Makes extra sense in this community. And it is still currently carrying the harmful meaning, it's not even just origin. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago Yup! Exactly our point. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Daxter101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 month ago (13 children) Fascist originating? Is it something about the lyrics? (I know nothing, asking for an explanation) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (12 children) The meme format/characters originate(s) from 4chan and therefore has deeply fascist roots. It's very self deprecating and plays into beauty standards because it implies only those commonly seen as 'ugly' by those standards are terrible and could never get partners. Whilst it also promotes those who are seen as conventionally attractive as 'good' and could therefore get partners. It is very much originating from incel culture for that reason too. The 'left' needs their own memes and to stop trying to 'clean' ones with harmful origins and meanings. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 4 points 1 month ago (8 children) The meme format/characters originate(s) from 4chan and therefore has deeply fascist roots. That's... that's a non-sequitur? Not that I care about what its roots are to be honest, but you're implicitly assuming 4chan is somehow inherently fascist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago (6 children) Image description: A scene from Mad Max: Fury Road where Max is driving in the car pointing up and at something and saying "That's bait." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 point 1 month ago (5 children) Uh... no need to describe the image twice? But also damn got me, my sinister plans have been foiled. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago (4 children) The double image description is for devices, frontends and apps that cannot see or access the first. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 1 month ago (3 children) Fair enough, but then why include the first? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Daxter101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) Assuming you're a person, the most descriptive/representative reason to add the description of an image, is as alt Text, for the visually impaired who use screen readers for example. Your claim that 4chan isn't necessarily fascistic is... Unfortunately ahistorical. 4chan has been so central to neonazi recruiting and propaganda, so many times, that it's not even funny anymore. Both the origin of the meme, and its real content, are pretty bad. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 point 1 month ago* for the visually impaired who use screen readers for example. I understand that, my question is why include it twice. Presumably screen readers will catch the second, so there's no reason to include the first. Your claim that 4chan isn't necessarily fascistic is... Unfortunately ahistorical. 4chan has been so central to neonazi recruiting and propaganda, so many times, that it's not even funny anymore. That's also a non-sequitur. 4chan being used for fascist purposes doesn't make anything that comes from 4chan fascist. The fact that 4chan is/has been used a lot by neonazis doesn't make 4chan inherently fascist, because only people can be fascist. 4chan has been used a lot for fascist propaganda, but so have radios. permalink fedilink source parent [–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 month ago That's a good question. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 1 month ago it has turned out that 4chan was quite literally made due to the involvement of Jefferey fucking Epstein permalink fedilink source parent [–] ddplf@szmer.info 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) The meme format/characters originate(s) from 4chan and therefore has deeply fascist roots. Yeah I'm not resigning from all the pepe and wojak originating memes, which is like 80% of the memes just because some random dude doesn''t like them. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Daxter101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) Ah yeah. Makes extra sense in this community. And it is still currently carrying the harmful meaning, it's not even just origin. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago Yup! Exactly our point. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (12 children) The meme format/characters originate(s) from 4chan and therefore has deeply fascist roots. It's very self deprecating and plays into beauty standards because it implies only those commonly seen as 'ugly' by those standards are terrible and could never get partners. Whilst it also promotes those who are seen as conventionally attractive as 'good' and could therefore get partners. It is very much originating from incel culture for that reason too. The 'left' needs their own memes and to stop trying to 'clean' ones with harmful origins and meanings. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 4 points 1 month ago (8 children) The meme format/characters originate(s) from 4chan and therefore has deeply fascist roots. That's... that's a non-sequitur? Not that I care about what its roots are to be honest, but you're implicitly assuming 4chan is somehow inherently fascist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago (6 children) Image description: A scene from Mad Max: Fury Road where Max is driving in the car pointing up and at something and saying "That's bait." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 point 1 month ago (5 children) Uh... no need to describe the image twice? But also damn got me, my sinister plans have been foiled. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago (4 children) The double image description is for devices, frontends and apps that cannot see or access the first. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 1 month ago (3 children) Fair enough, but then why include the first? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Daxter101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) Assuming you're a person, the most descriptive/representative reason to add the description of an image, is as alt Text, for the visually impaired who use screen readers for example. Your claim that 4chan isn't necessarily fascistic is... Unfortunately ahistorical. 4chan has been so central to neonazi recruiting and propaganda, so many times, that it's not even funny anymore. Both the origin of the meme, and its real content, are pretty bad. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 point 1 month ago* for the visually impaired who use screen readers for example. I understand that, my question is why include it twice. Presumably screen readers will catch the second, so there's no reason to include the first. Your claim that 4chan isn't necessarily fascistic is... Unfortunately ahistorical. 4chan has been so central to neonazi recruiting and propaganda, so many times, that it's not even funny anymore. That's also a non-sequitur. 4chan being used for fascist purposes doesn't make anything that comes from 4chan fascist. The fact that 4chan is/has been used a lot by neonazis doesn't make 4chan inherently fascist, because only people can be fascist. 4chan has been used a lot for fascist propaganda, but so have radios. permalink fedilink source parent [–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 month ago That's a good question. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 1 month ago it has turned out that 4chan was quite literally made due to the involvement of Jefferey fucking Epstein permalink fedilink source parent [–] ddplf@szmer.info 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) The meme format/characters originate(s) from 4chan and therefore has deeply fascist roots. Yeah I'm not resigning from all the pepe and wojak originating memes, which is like 80% of the memes just because some random dude doesn''t like them. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Daxter101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) Ah yeah. Makes extra sense in this community. And it is still currently carrying the harmful meaning, it's not even just origin. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago Yup! Exactly our point. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 4 points 1 month ago (8 children) The meme format/characters originate(s) from 4chan and therefore has deeply fascist roots. That's... that's a non-sequitur? Not that I care about what its roots are to be honest, but you're implicitly assuming 4chan is somehow inherently fascist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago (6 children) Image description: A scene from Mad Max: Fury Road where Max is driving in the car pointing up and at something and saying "That's bait." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 point 1 month ago (5 children) Uh... no need to describe the image twice? But also damn got me, my sinister plans have been foiled. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago (4 children) The double image description is for devices, frontends and apps that cannot see or access the first. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 1 month ago (3 children) Fair enough, but then why include the first? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Daxter101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) Assuming you're a person, the most descriptive/representative reason to add the description of an image, is as alt Text, for the visually impaired who use screen readers for example. Your claim that 4chan isn't necessarily fascistic is... Unfortunately ahistorical. 4chan has been so central to neonazi recruiting and propaganda, so many times, that it's not even funny anymore. Both the origin of the meme, and its real content, are pretty bad. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 point 1 month ago* for the visually impaired who use screen readers for example. I understand that, my question is why include it twice. Presumably screen readers will catch the second, so there's no reason to include the first. Your claim that 4chan isn't necessarily fascistic is... Unfortunately ahistorical. 4chan has been so central to neonazi recruiting and propaganda, so many times, that it's not even funny anymore. That's also a non-sequitur. 4chan being used for fascist purposes doesn't make anything that comes from 4chan fascist. The fact that 4chan is/has been used a lot by neonazis doesn't make 4chan inherently fascist, because only people can be fascist. 4chan has been used a lot for fascist propaganda, but so have radios. permalink fedilink source parent [–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 month ago That's a good question. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 1 month ago it has turned out that 4chan was quite literally made due to the involvement of Jefferey fucking Epstein permalink fedilink source parent
[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago (6 children) Image description: A scene from Mad Max: Fury Road where Max is driving in the car pointing up and at something and saying "That's bait." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 point 1 month ago (5 children) Uh... no need to describe the image twice? But also damn got me, my sinister plans have been foiled. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago (4 children) The double image description is for devices, frontends and apps that cannot see or access the first. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 1 month ago (3 children) Fair enough, but then why include the first? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Daxter101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) Assuming you're a person, the most descriptive/representative reason to add the description of an image, is as alt Text, for the visually impaired who use screen readers for example. Your claim that 4chan isn't necessarily fascistic is... Unfortunately ahistorical. 4chan has been so central to neonazi recruiting and propaganda, so many times, that it's not even funny anymore. Both the origin of the meme, and its real content, are pretty bad. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 point 1 month ago* for the visually impaired who use screen readers for example. I understand that, my question is why include it twice. Presumably screen readers will catch the second, so there's no reason to include the first. Your claim that 4chan isn't necessarily fascistic is... Unfortunately ahistorical. 4chan has been so central to neonazi recruiting and propaganda, so many times, that it's not even funny anymore. That's also a non-sequitur. 4chan being used for fascist purposes doesn't make anything that comes from 4chan fascist. The fact that 4chan is/has been used a lot by neonazis doesn't make 4chan inherently fascist, because only people can be fascist. 4chan has been used a lot for fascist propaganda, but so have radios. permalink fedilink source parent [–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 month ago That's a good question. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 point 1 month ago (5 children) Uh... no need to describe the image twice? But also damn got me, my sinister plans have been foiled. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago (4 children) The double image description is for devices, frontends and apps that cannot see or access the first. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 1 month ago (3 children) Fair enough, but then why include the first? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Daxter101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) Assuming you're a person, the most descriptive/representative reason to add the description of an image, is as alt Text, for the visually impaired who use screen readers for example. Your claim that 4chan isn't necessarily fascistic is... Unfortunately ahistorical. 4chan has been so central to neonazi recruiting and propaganda, so many times, that it's not even funny anymore. Both the origin of the meme, and its real content, are pretty bad. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 point 1 month ago* for the visually impaired who use screen readers for example. I understand that, my question is why include it twice. Presumably screen readers will catch the second, so there's no reason to include the first. Your claim that 4chan isn't necessarily fascistic is... Unfortunately ahistorical. 4chan has been so central to neonazi recruiting and propaganda, so many times, that it's not even funny anymore. That's also a non-sequitur. 4chan being used for fascist purposes doesn't make anything that comes from 4chan fascist. The fact that 4chan is/has been used a lot by neonazis doesn't make 4chan inherently fascist, because only people can be fascist. 4chan has been used a lot for fascist propaganda, but so have radios. permalink fedilink source parent [–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 month ago That's a good question. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago (4 children) The double image description is for devices, frontends and apps that cannot see or access the first. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 1 month ago (3 children) Fair enough, but then why include the first? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Daxter101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) Assuming you're a person, the most descriptive/representative reason to add the description of an image, is as alt Text, for the visually impaired who use screen readers for example. Your claim that 4chan isn't necessarily fascistic is... Unfortunately ahistorical. 4chan has been so central to neonazi recruiting and propaganda, so many times, that it's not even funny anymore. Both the origin of the meme, and its real content, are pretty bad. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 point 1 month ago* for the visually impaired who use screen readers for example. I understand that, my question is why include it twice. Presumably screen readers will catch the second, so there's no reason to include the first. Your claim that 4chan isn't necessarily fascistic is... Unfortunately ahistorical. 4chan has been so central to neonazi recruiting and propaganda, so many times, that it's not even funny anymore. That's also a non-sequitur. 4chan being used for fascist purposes doesn't make anything that comes from 4chan fascist. The fact that 4chan is/has been used a lot by neonazis doesn't make 4chan inherently fascist, because only people can be fascist. 4chan has been used a lot for fascist propaganda, but so have radios. permalink fedilink source parent [–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 month ago That's a good question. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 1 month ago (3 children) Fair enough, but then why include the first? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Daxter101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) Assuming you're a person, the most descriptive/representative reason to add the description of an image, is as alt Text, for the visually impaired who use screen readers for example. Your claim that 4chan isn't necessarily fascistic is... Unfortunately ahistorical. 4chan has been so central to neonazi recruiting and propaganda, so many times, that it's not even funny anymore. Both the origin of the meme, and its real content, are pretty bad. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 point 1 month ago* for the visually impaired who use screen readers for example. I understand that, my question is why include it twice. Presumably screen readers will catch the second, so there's no reason to include the first. Your claim that 4chan isn't necessarily fascistic is... Unfortunately ahistorical. 4chan has been so central to neonazi recruiting and propaganda, so many times, that it's not even funny anymore. That's also a non-sequitur. 4chan being used for fascist purposes doesn't make anything that comes from 4chan fascist. The fact that 4chan is/has been used a lot by neonazis doesn't make 4chan inherently fascist, because only people can be fascist. 4chan has been used a lot for fascist propaganda, but so have radios. permalink fedilink source parent [–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 month ago That's a good question. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Daxter101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) Assuming you're a person, the most descriptive/representative reason to add the description of an image, is as alt Text, for the visually impaired who use screen readers for example. Your claim that 4chan isn't necessarily fascistic is... Unfortunately ahistorical. 4chan has been so central to neonazi recruiting and propaganda, so many times, that it's not even funny anymore. Both the origin of the meme, and its real content, are pretty bad. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 point 1 month ago* for the visually impaired who use screen readers for example. I understand that, my question is why include it twice. Presumably screen readers will catch the second, so there's no reason to include the first. Your claim that 4chan isn't necessarily fascistic is... Unfortunately ahistorical. 4chan has been so central to neonazi recruiting and propaganda, so many times, that it's not even funny anymore. That's also a non-sequitur. 4chan being used for fascist purposes doesn't make anything that comes from 4chan fascist. The fact that 4chan is/has been used a lot by neonazis doesn't make 4chan inherently fascist, because only people can be fascist. 4chan has been used a lot for fascist propaganda, but so have radios. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 point 1 month ago* for the visually impaired who use screen readers for example. I understand that, my question is why include it twice. Presumably screen readers will catch the second, so there's no reason to include the first. Your claim that 4chan isn't necessarily fascistic is... Unfortunately ahistorical. 4chan has been so central to neonazi recruiting and propaganda, so many times, that it's not even funny anymore. That's also a non-sequitur. 4chan being used for fascist purposes doesn't make anything that comes from 4chan fascist. The fact that 4chan is/has been used a lot by neonazis doesn't make 4chan inherently fascist, because only people can be fascist. 4chan has been used a lot for fascist propaganda, but so have radios. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 month ago That's a good question. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 1 month ago it has turned out that 4chan was quite literally made due to the involvement of Jefferey fucking Epstein permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ddplf@szmer.info 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) The meme format/characters originate(s) from 4chan and therefore has deeply fascist roots. Yeah I'm not resigning from all the pepe and wojak originating memes, which is like 80% of the memes just because some random dude doesn''t like them. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Daxter101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) Ah yeah. Makes extra sense in this community. And it is still currently carrying the harmful meaning, it's not even just origin. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago Yup! Exactly our point. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago Yup! Exactly our point. permalink fedilink source parent