▲ 1003 ▼ Bernie Sanders says if AI is coming for workers, it should bring a four-day workweek with it (fortune.com) submitted 1 month ago by Mustachius_Grumpius@thelemmy.club to c/technology@lemmy.world 180 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago (3 children) Yeah but it’s also just kind of a shitty tool. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] NuanceDemon@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 1 month ago (2 children) Thats a take, but if you pair that sentiment with what I just said it paints a funny picture. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] athatet@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago (1 child) Like if I went to the store and bought a cheap hammer and it breaks after a few swings it’s a shitty tool. No matter my expertise with said tool. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] NuanceDemon@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 1 month ago That analogy only works if the AI literally stops functioning after a few uses. A better comparison would be a tool that performs badly when used for the wrong job or by someone who doesn't know its limitations. “Sometimes produces bad output” isn't the same thing as “shitty tool.” Which just feeds back into what I've already said. Shall we go around again? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NuanceDemon@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 1 month ago (2 children) Thats a take, but if you pair that sentiment with what I just said it paints a funny picture. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] athatet@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago (1 child) Like if I went to the store and bought a cheap hammer and it breaks after a few swings it’s a shitty tool. No matter my expertise with said tool. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] NuanceDemon@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 1 month ago That analogy only works if the AI literally stops functioning after a few uses. A better comparison would be a tool that performs badly when used for the wrong job or by someone who doesn't know its limitations. “Sometimes produces bad output” isn't the same thing as “shitty tool.” Which just feeds back into what I've already said. Shall we go around again? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago (1 child) Like if I went to the store and bought a cheap hammer and it breaks after a few swings it’s a shitty tool. No matter my expertise with said tool. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] NuanceDemon@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 1 month ago That analogy only works if the AI literally stops functioning after a few uses. A better comparison would be a tool that performs badly when used for the wrong job or by someone who doesn't know its limitations. “Sometimes produces bad output” isn't the same thing as “shitty tool.” Which just feeds back into what I've already said. Shall we go around again? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NuanceDemon@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 1 month ago That analogy only works if the AI literally stops functioning after a few uses. A better comparison would be a tool that performs badly when used for the wrong job or by someone who doesn't know its limitations. “Sometimes produces bad output” isn't the same thing as “shitty tool.” Which just feeds back into what I've already said. Shall we go around again? permalink fedilink source parent