38
The Smart Home Wi-Fi Trap: Are We All Being Conned by Convenience? (unknownuniverse.uk)
submitted 1 month ago by to c/privacy@programming.dev
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Mainstream tech advice treats cheap Wi-Fi smart plugs as harmless convenience, totally glossing over how much telemetry leaks out to overseas cloud servers by default.

Expecting casual users to set up VLANs and firewall drop rules just to stop a £10 light bulb from phoning home is a bit of a joke.

True privacy means local control without corporate middlemen.

Original content by The Unknown Universe, written by a human and not AI generated!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I wish I had started off with z-wave instead of WiFi.

It's annoying that it's proprietary, but ZigBee operating on 2.4GHz is a deal breaker for me.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (3 children)

    Can't bad actors still affect ZWave? Asking out of genuine curiosity

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    One benefit of ZWave is that it operates on the 900MHz band instead of 2.4GHz, giving it both better range and penetration and avoiding interference from WiFi.

    The security benefit is that 99/100 times, connecting a device to WiFi also gives it internet access. The user has to manually intervene and block this ability, the device has internet by default. This is simply not the case for a ZWave device. For those to connect to the internet and to malicious domains, you would need to be able to access the ZWave coordinator with a compromised device. It adds a whole new necessary link to the chain.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent