you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -2 points 2 months ago (7 children)

But it does mean nobody to enforce the rules, which means no rules.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

    No it doesn't, name one anarchist society where this was an issue in the real world.

    https://anarwiki.org/wiki/List_of_Anarchist_Societies

    point to them here

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    And the largest one in that list is...? And the longest lasting is...? Just because you can balance a knife on its tip doesn't mean that that's a stable configuration, and if anarchism is not stable, why bother talking about it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    That's a different point, we can move onto that one next if you'd like, first i'd like you to concede your previous one.

    simply admit what you said has never happened in the real world, and anarchism doesn't mean no rules, it means no rulers.

    Unless you have an example where that happened on the list, where that was the reason for the collapse.

  • source
  • parent