Could you say more about your research process for this article? The way it is written and the way the website is formatted is very LLM-esque, it lacks in text citations, the relevance and authenticity of the citations at the end are not easily verified. Your post history consists of links to this website. Given how easy it would be to generate such an article with hallucinated misinformation about historical details, if you actually put work into researching this like you claim I think it would be good to give people a little more to go on so we can know this isn't just bullshit. People having an accurate understanding of history is important and that deserves respect.