A juror in the trial of Lindsay Clancy is sharing new details about what he said happened inside the jury room that led to a mistrial in the case of the Massachusetts woman facing first-degree murder charges for the 2023 deaths of her three young children.

Nick Dargie, one of the three men on the 12-person jury, told ABC News' Aaron Katersky that the lone holdout juror who prevented a unanimous verdict did not show any evidence explaining his vote.

"There was several times I would ask him to show us evidence or, you know, describe a witness testimony that helped to prove what he was saying, and ... he couldn't," Dargie, 25, said in an interview Wednesday.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 25 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Seems to me that if that were the case he could have pointed to a particular piece of evidence or witness testimony that supports his conclusion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Well, there was that whole trial. And everyone does agree she strangled her kids.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago

    She admitted to the killings, yes. The problem was deciding her mental fitness to be held responsible criminally.

    Lets not just ignore the legal nuance that makes this a complex situation. Otherwise we'll just talk past each other the entire time.

  • source
  • parent