A juror in the trial of Lindsay Clancy is sharing new details about what he said happened inside the jury room that led to a mistrial in the case of the Massachusetts woman facing first-degree murder charges for the 2023 deaths of her three young children.

Nick Dargie, one of the three men on the 12-person jury, told ABC News' Aaron Katersky that the lone holdout juror who prevented a unanimous verdict did not show any evidence explaining his vote.

"There was several times I would ask him to show us evidence or, you know, describe a witness testimony that helped to prove what he was saying, and ... he couldn't," Dargie, 25, said in an interview Wednesday.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -6 points 1 month ago (10 children)

Good for him, you shouldn't let a murderer off just because of peer pressure.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    I mean, wasn't it either prison or high security mental health facility? I don't think she gets off scott free either way.

    I don't get why people act like the dude was the sole hero blocking her from going free and getting starbucks on the way to her next infanticide.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    She has a chance of getting out of the mental health facility, thats what I believe most people are having an issue with. Personally I think she was and is insane but I don't think anyone who murders children should ever walk free. It's a hard spot to be in because she definitely needs the mental help and she wont get that in prison but the murders are unforgivable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Its not on us to "forgive" her. I don't know why people feel like they personally got victimized by her. From all accounts she was a loving mother, the people that actually knew and loved the kids are supporting her bc they are certain she must have been insane at the time.

    She should have a chance of getting out when sane since there is no reason to keep someone when not a danger anymore. I don't really get off on punishing people, i only tolerate it as long as it serves a purpose.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 25 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Seems to me that if that were the case he could have pointed to a particular piece of evidence or witness testimony that supports his conclusion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Well, there was that whole trial. And everyone does agree she strangled her kids.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago

    She admitted to the killings, yes. The problem was deciding her mental fitness to be held responsible criminally.

    Lets not just ignore the legal nuance that makes this a complex situation. Otherwise we'll just talk past each other the entire time.

  • source
  • parent