Not Navier-Stokes, that was a couple days ago, old news. It's one of the less famous problems they posted around the same time.

The cited Mathstodon post is here: https://mathstodon.xyz/@andreasthom/117240535270608201

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Do people consider conversations with LLMs private? I don't think there is actual guarantee which protects the conversations. ..are people that naive?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I would expect that email sent through something like gmail is private. Even if there's some possibility of interception under search warrants or stuff like that, I wouldn't expect the email text to be used for training Google AI. I don't use gmail (at least from the client side) anyway, but I think there was some noise about this a while back. Certainly I'd expect a paid LLM server to not train on the prompts. I don't use those servers though, and haven't checked the TOS. I might fool around with some open models sometime but have no interest in ChatGPT.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Gmail has been reading your mail and processing it for marketing data since day 1. This is made obvious by the fact that they sorted your mail into categories.

    You didn’t really think that’s all they did with that data, did you?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Yep.

    The era of Google and big social media did real harm IMO. I suspect we used to have more scepticism around this sort of thing (dunno though). But getting addicted to things sure as hell is a good way to get you to ignore their problems.

    The era of desktop computing really is gross in so many ways once you take a step back.

  • source
  • parent