you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)

What a horribly lazy pun, brought to us by the most overrated school in all of comicsdom, the New Yorker Style.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)

    I'm okay with the comic, though I'm not a fan of The New Yorker's articles.

    But the spacing on the typeface in the caption around those right-hand quote marks, both the single and double, is killing me.

    looks more

    I guess maybe when they made the italic font, they had to move the quote marks to avoid colliding with slanted letters, like the capital T---the left-hand quote marks next to it look fine to me. But then, maybe they didn't add kerning information so that if an adjacent character didn't require shifting, the right-hand quotes didn't shift all the way over, so they're always left hanging out there to make space for potentially-problematic characters.

    You'd think that an entity like The New Yorker, with a long history of printed output, would have selected solid typefaces.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    I don't think the articles in New Yorker are bad. I do think the illustrations are outstanding, but their cartoons are mostly overrated, artistically conservative, generic fare, imo.

    Re: the bad typeface, my guess this may have a comic that was submitted for the New Yorker but rejected, so the cartoonist just published it wherever b/c I agree, I don't think the NYer would eff that up. Just guessing tho

  • source
  • parent