you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

For public transportation in the US you need medium density living. So you're talking about getting everyone on board and uprooting everyone as you upgrade cities or build new cities for that.

"Anything except making incremental improvements that are practical instead of doing nothing because the preferred goal is impossible, at least practically impossible" - not as catchy, I admit :P

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 6 points 2 months ago
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    I agree - I should have said medium mixed zoning as that's what I was intending to convery :)

    Also, for wheelchair users like me, higher density would probably lead to cheaper delivery services of all kinds - Walmart has that market cornered at the moment, and I hate that it's Walmart that figured it out. :|

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-2 replies)
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Isn't everyone complaining about not having enough housing?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Oligarchs aren't, which I only lead with because they are a huge fuckin' part of the problem.

    We actually have huge amounts of unused housing being held to drive up prices for the rest.

    But it's largely the wrong type of housing. Consider if you have 10,000 unhoused people, and you have 15,000 unoccupied trailers on land - but these trailers are in a remote county, miles outside the county's main city of 6000 people. If those 10,000 unhoused families can't find work out there and don't have a car, it doesn't help. An extremely stupid example to say that the current housing we have is largely not the housing we need.

  • source
  • parent