you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

intent is not particularly relevant here. Only justification is relevant

Holy shit you're stupid you genuinely do not understand what intent means in a legal sense.

Intent is justification you moron. You didn't Google it once.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I have read this article on general intent and this article on specific intent. I have also read this article on justification as well as this article on self defense which also discusses justification.

    Intent and justification are two separate concepts. "Intent" refers to the actor's internal state of mind. "Justification" refers to the external conditions the actor faces at the time of the action.

    As we cannot know the contents of the minds of either participant (nor can the participants know the minds of eachother) "intent" is not the relevant model for this discussion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    YOU'RE NOT A LAWYER.

    I don't care what the hell you read dude lmfao you've been running around with your chatgpt ass answers thinking you're right and saying shit that you then contradict yourself with.

    Remember when you said intent didn't matter? Justification did? Fucking idiot.

    Remember when you said she committed ASSAULT!!! and his actions were "questionable" and then it made you sad he kicked her?

    You're fucking stupid. Shut up and stop defending this man who absolutely committed assault three goddamn times.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago

    Remember when you said intent didn’t matter? Justification did? Fucking idiot.

    Yes. I do. And I stand by that, as I have explained.

    Remember when you said she committed ASSAULT!!! and his actions were “questionable” and then it made you sad he kicked her?

    Indeed. I remember both. And I remember that I've addressed every concern you've raised about those conclusions.

    chatgpt

    While I am reasonably certain that nobody reading along would actually think my comments are from chatgpt, I feel compelled to specifically deny that any of my published comments have been generated by any sort of LLM. The closest I have come to an LLM is the image of a rabbit with a "cigar cutter" I use as an avatar. I seem to recall criticizing various AI works in the past, and may have quoted or attached examples here on lemmy or in other media, but any such use would clearly delineate my content from any AI content. I cannot guarantee that external links I have provided are entirely devoid of AI content.

  • source
  • parent