Until very recently, Karyann Parkinson lived in leafy Williamsburg, Virginia. She and her husband, Dallin, moved there from Utah so Parkinson could attend William and Mary Law School.

In June, when Parkinson was preparing for the bar—and also happened to be eight months pregnant with her fifth child—she and her then-youngest, Sam, went for a bike ride, as they often do. They stopped for her son's favorite activity: collecting goose feathers from the path near their community pond. When they got home, he asked if he could walk back and get some more.

Parkinson said yes. It's a short walk, along a sidewalk separated from the street by 10 feet of grass. Sam would have to cross two streets with crosswalks, which she'd seen him do safely hundreds of times—including six times that morning, she says. Off he went while she made lunch.

A passerby saw Sam and alerted security. One of the community's security guards escorted the boy back and gave Parkinson an earful. Pretty soon there were three cop cars, just as many cops, a security vehicle, and two Child Protective Services (CPS) workers at Parkinson's door.

CPS ended up investigating her for abuse and neglect.

The cops, meanwhile, charged her with contributing to the delinquency of a minor. CPS found the allegations substantiated and placed Parkinson on the state's child abuse and neglect registry. She will remain there for seven years.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 6 points 2 months ago (4 children)

The statement that this five year old was fine by that pond is referencing this specific instance. The kid was fine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Was this a five year old Kal-El and this was Smallville? Was this child incapable of drowning?

    Yes, this kid was fine. Maybe he is fine because busy body security guard intervened before he chased a goose into the pond. We’ll never know, which is why the mother is charged with negligence and not something more serious.

    I hear what you’re saying that there are too many busy bodies out there being nosy and not letting kids be kids and parents be parents. I agree with that statement.

    This isn’t a good example of that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Damn, you must have been one really dumb 5 year old.

    I'm guessing you're also one of those people that can't remember much of when they were young, too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Have you been around five year olds? They don't yet have the skills to be safe around a body of water unsupervised. It's why people put fences around their pools.

    Seriously, you people should not be trusted with children if you think an unsupervised five year old is safe around a body of water.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    Well, way to prove what I said 🤣

    Just because you were a little slower than your peers at learning something, doesn't mean most are.

    "Have you been around five year olds?" Nah man, I just hatched out of an egg already six years old 🙄 just imagined all the cousins I took care of growing up too.

    Edit: also want to address a pool isn't the same as a man-made pond. One has a steep immediate drop, the other is muddy and shallow as it slowly gets deeper. That's why a pool is more dangerous than a pond.

    The other reason they're fenced is because actual toddlers might wander into a pool. Just because you might've been breast fed at 5 still doesn't mean a 5 year old is a toddler.

  • source
  • parent