125
Cities are Replacing Flock with Axon / Motorola for their Mass Surveillance Network (cdn.social.linux.pizza)
submitted 2 months ago by to c/DeFlock@sh.itjust.works
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Flock Safety became the protested brand. Axon Enterprise now sells Outpost and Lightpost readers that livestream and feed Axon Fusus; Fleet cameras scan plates from patrol cars. Motorola Solutions bought VaaS for $445 million in 2019 and kept Vigilant Solutions and Digital Recognition Network. The vendor changes, the mass surveillance network remains.

Cameras are not the only issue with surveillance systems like these. These devices can also log Audio, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, and RFID and other signals your devices broadcast. Then they fuse data collected without warrants with commercial data-broker records and "AI", to create a comprehensive database of everyone surveiled, who everyone is, what that are doing, and what they "will do".

These are not just cameras or license plate readers, this is a surveillance network. It's a violation of privacy and the 4th amendment, and we should not let this happen.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Does it even matter if your car has tire pressure monitoring?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Oh, if you are actually in your car, I'd give up any expectation of anonymonity. Just in case you're out walking. Also make sure to park a few blocks away at least from your destination if you're doing anything interesting.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I've heard that utilizing quick dry spray paint on a cheap bike, and a small outfit change is fairly good camouflage for people. Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but these surveillance cameras don't have facial recognition, right?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    The images can surely be sent somewheree that does facial recognition. What you want in that case is sunglasses that block IR. IPD--interpupillary distance--is a key number in facial recognition.

    though at this point, it's probably all a lost cause.

    you can probably have very limited comms anonymously at best these days, but the best you can hope for outside of that is not making it too easy.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago

    There are white boxes mounted on poles all over the place. They aren't cameras. They were originally microwave traffic counters, but evolved to measure and collect all sorts of wireless data.

    Each car that they spot, they can also grab passive WiFi data and Bluetooth. Probably others.

    Your car probably has its own WiFi and Bluetooth, so unless its 20+ years old, you've been cataloged and tracked. Also, there are the devices you can see, but assume there are plenty you cannot.

    Short of driving a very old car or maybe a motorcycle, you're being tracked. Even if you are driving something old, now you stick out as not being trackable. Unless there are a lot of other cars in this state, you'd be easy to find.

    This whole situation is intolerable, but many people have no idea its even happening. Either that or they say something stupid like "I'm not doing anything interesting, why should I care?". Then a few months later, the systems get breached and scummy people can follow you, track your movement and do something to you or your loved ones. Maybe you should have cared.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent