you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 1 point 2 months ago (18 children)
  • [โ€“] 0 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    maybe you should try understanding the underlying science

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)
  • [โ€“] 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    so you say, but i had to explain the issue with the LCA data to you, so i don't believe you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 0 points 2 months ago (12 children)

    yeah. using somebody else's LCA methodology doesn't make their methodology any good.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 2 months ago (7 children)
  • [โ€“] 0 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    you have yet to articulate how it is bad.

    only if you're illiterate

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 2 months ago (5 children)
  • [โ€“] 0 points 2 months ago (4 children)
  • [+] 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)
  • [โ€“] 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    except all the evidence I have provided

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)