you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 2 months ago* (5 children)

I’d love a source for this claim.

The source is literally in the OP article.

Ocasio-Cortez Loses the Democratic Socialists’ Endorsement Over Israel

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    No, the source does not make that claim. But more importantly, I see you're ignoring the rest of their misinformation. Even if I concede that point, which I am not prepared to do, the rest of their comment is sheer bullshit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    I didn't say anything about the rest of their comment. You asked for a source and I provided it.

    How on earth does a source talking about the DSA deliberately withdrawing their support not contradict your claim that they "didn't notice" she wasn't a member?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

    It added: “Previously, the representative joined DSA in 2018 with a one-year membership, which DSA’s national leadership recently noticed had lapsed, in 2019. She has since renewed her membership as of this month.”

    Do you not understand language?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    AOC has previously made a deliberate point of talking about not being a member of the national organization, but rather her local one. The national DSA withdrew their conditional endorsement over her stance on Israel.

    Now that they're making amends, they're putting it that way to be diplomatic, as though it was a simple oversight. But there have been significant rifts and disagreements, so it isn't a non-story like you suggested.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Now you're making new claims that are NOT in the article that you have not sourced.

    Don't bother, I don't care enough to look further nor care more to listen to you. Have a day. Maybe even a good day. :) But certainly have a day (becuse the alternate would suck, and I'm attempting humour by implying "have a bad day', but it's just being silly at you. In case that feels like mixed messages, our interaction is irritating, but c'est la vie, humour indicates it's not personal, just disagreement with what you're saying)

  • source
  • parent