▲ 203 ▼ Crazy things are happening on Wayfair (lemmy.world) submitted 2 months ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/facepalm@lemmy.world 43 comments fedilink hide all child comments I'm so confused. Was this intentional? Did AI backfire and they uploaded the output anyway? Was it malicious compliance?
[–] linkinkampf19@lemmy.world 103 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (12 children) And I thought my discovery with their AI gen furniture was bad. Was shopping for a bedframe and found this amongst the mix: permalink fedilink source hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world [S] 107 points 2 months ago (3 children) Ah yes, that bedframe must be from the coveted M.C. Escher collection. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] linkinkampf19@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago (2 children) It would be cool if it were feasible, but I also wanna know exactly what the end product will look like. I've seen a few of these generated pics on Wayfair, and outside of cost, what else would they be reducing by cutting out the physical model and people involved? Like won't the return rate go up and then cost them (significantly) more anyway? Oh wait, it is just about line go up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] snooggums@piefed.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 child) Taking high quality shots isn't cheap, but subsidized slop machine vomit sure is! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago A modern smartphone would take a good shot. They just can't be bothered to mock it up, I guess. permalink fedilink source parent [–] riskable@programming.dev 23 points 2 months ago (1 child) If this was real, I'd be so impressed! The impossible geometry clearly indicates... Well, who wouldn't want a non-euclidean bed‽ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] linkinkampf19@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago I mean... infinite comfiness? Just gotta find a non-euclidean mattress now. permalink fedilink source parent [–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 7 points 2 months ago Perfect for bruising your lower leg! permalink fedilink source parent [–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago (4 children) Was this being sold as an actual product? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] linkinkampf19@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (3 children) Yep. Linky. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (2 children) So there's a second image that looks actually plausible. The gables are turned the other way, and the geometry checks out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] linkinkampf19@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) I think that part the reason why it seemed so strange. That image could easily also be AI (like 95% sure), but it's getting really difficult to recognize sometimes. Only tell I found so far was the weird bunny on the shelf facing away from the shot, and the text on the books is too low-res to gauge. The string lights are a bit sus too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago Even if I didn't have a shed full of woodworking tools I wouldn't buy it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world [S] 107 points 2 months ago (3 children) Ah yes, that bedframe must be from the coveted M.C. Escher collection. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] linkinkampf19@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago (2 children) It would be cool if it were feasible, but I also wanna know exactly what the end product will look like. I've seen a few of these generated pics on Wayfair, and outside of cost, what else would they be reducing by cutting out the physical model and people involved? Like won't the return rate go up and then cost them (significantly) more anyway? Oh wait, it is just about line go up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] snooggums@piefed.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 child) Taking high quality shots isn't cheap, but subsidized slop machine vomit sure is! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago A modern smartphone would take a good shot. They just can't be bothered to mock it up, I guess. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] linkinkampf19@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago (2 children) It would be cool if it were feasible, but I also wanna know exactly what the end product will look like. I've seen a few of these generated pics on Wayfair, and outside of cost, what else would they be reducing by cutting out the physical model and people involved? Like won't the return rate go up and then cost them (significantly) more anyway? Oh wait, it is just about line go up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] snooggums@piefed.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 child) Taking high quality shots isn't cheap, but subsidized slop machine vomit sure is! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago A modern smartphone would take a good shot. They just can't be bothered to mock it up, I guess. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] snooggums@piefed.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 child) Taking high quality shots isn't cheap, but subsidized slop machine vomit sure is! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago A modern smartphone would take a good shot. They just can't be bothered to mock it up, I guess. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago A modern smartphone would take a good shot. They just can't be bothered to mock it up, I guess. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] riskable@programming.dev 23 points 2 months ago (1 child) If this was real, I'd be so impressed! The impossible geometry clearly indicates... Well, who wouldn't want a non-euclidean bed‽ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] linkinkampf19@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago I mean... infinite comfiness? Just gotta find a non-euclidean mattress now. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] linkinkampf19@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago I mean... infinite comfiness? Just gotta find a non-euclidean mattress now. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 7 points 2 months ago Perfect for bruising your lower leg! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago (4 children) Was this being sold as an actual product? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] linkinkampf19@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (3 children) Yep. Linky. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (2 children) So there's a second image that looks actually plausible. The gables are turned the other way, and the geometry checks out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] linkinkampf19@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) I think that part the reason why it seemed so strange. That image could easily also be AI (like 95% sure), but it's getting really difficult to recognize sometimes. Only tell I found so far was the weird bunny on the shelf facing away from the shot, and the text on the books is too low-res to gauge. The string lights are a bit sus too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago Even if I didn't have a shed full of woodworking tools I wouldn't buy it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] linkinkampf19@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (3 children) Yep. Linky. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (2 children) So there's a second image that looks actually plausible. The gables are turned the other way, and the geometry checks out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] linkinkampf19@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) I think that part the reason why it seemed so strange. That image could easily also be AI (like 95% sure), but it's getting really difficult to recognize sometimes. Only tell I found so far was the weird bunny on the shelf facing away from the shot, and the text on the books is too low-res to gauge. The string lights are a bit sus too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago Even if I didn't have a shed full of woodworking tools I wouldn't buy it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (2 children) So there's a second image that looks actually plausible. The gables are turned the other way, and the geometry checks out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] linkinkampf19@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) I think that part the reason why it seemed so strange. That image could easily also be AI (like 95% sure), but it's getting really difficult to recognize sometimes. Only tell I found so far was the weird bunny on the shelf facing away from the shot, and the text on the books is too low-res to gauge. The string lights are a bit sus too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago Even if I didn't have a shed full of woodworking tools I wouldn't buy it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] linkinkampf19@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago (1 child) I think that part the reason why it seemed so strange. That image could easily also be AI (like 95% sure), but it's getting really difficult to recognize sometimes. Only tell I found so far was the weird bunny on the shelf facing away from the shot, and the text on the books is too low-res to gauge. The string lights are a bit sus too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago Even if I didn't have a shed full of woodworking tools I wouldn't buy it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago Even if I didn't have a shed full of woodworking tools I wouldn't buy it. permalink fedilink source parent