you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

lmao it really doesnt matter, could you be any more up your own ass

but anyway this isnt about having google or apple scanning your phone files

anyone paranoid (rightly or not) enough to think they need to physically cover their camera shouldnt have a phone with a fucking camera

there is a reason presidents in the past got a special locked down phone, and the fact certain idiot heads of state not using those special phones while discussing even state secrets is a big deal

if you are covering the camera but not worried about the mic…

and lol if you think this cant be done remotely with 0 user input

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/05/21/trump-phone-security-risk-hackers-601903

anyone this important needs to be using a safe device, said device would not need a sticker on its camera, and probably would not have a camera to begin with

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    You're arguing with yourself, while agreeing with me, while calling me up my ass?

    Who's your drug dealer, I want to meet 'em.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    my point hasnt changed

    if you couldnt get how it was relevant the first time that is on you

    and i called you up your own ass because of the very thing you are doing here again

    anyway, waste of time have a block

  • source
  • parent