you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (15 children)

Vast majority of problems in the world are caused by people with positions of authority. We treat authority the same way a scientist would, who just discovered that the radium in toothpaste is harmful.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (14 children)

    There aren't many examples of authorityless communities to compare to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (13 children)

    The egalitarian Indus valley civilisation was just as technologically advanced, and lasted longer than the roman empire despite being much smaller.

    The mapuche a (relatively) egalitarian tribe located in south america, was able to defend itself against the Spanish colonizers for almost three decades.

    The early neolithic southern levenant was peaceful for over 10,000 years. we know this because they only started to build fortifications when the Egyptians arrived

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (11 children)

    despite being much smaller.

    It's because they were much smaller. Anarchy doesn't scale.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    smaller as in having a peak population of 5 million compared to the roman empire which had a peak population of 75 million people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Yes, being 15x less populated is smaller.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I dont see why it couldn't scale up beyond just 5 million

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    Because the larger the population, the more coordination of resources is required. A tiered government structure is the most efficient way to do this. Logistics for a city are very different than logistics for a continent.

    And this was before globalization/industrialization too. What worked for societies thousands of years ago isn't a good indicator of what would work now.

    But ultimately humans are the problem. The larger the population, the easier it is for bad actors to create positions of power.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Am not familiar with with logistics but arent they already ran decentralized?

    But ultimately humans are the problem. The larger the population, the easier it is for bad actors to create positions of power.

    I agree. History has shown us repeatedly that bad actors will always eventually find a way to get into positions of power. We reject political authority because we want to break out of the endless cycle of wars, man-made famines and genocides.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

    The current system is obviously handling all of the worlds problems so well, without any starving families or climate change driven injustice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments